🐛 Fix update options bug

[lukevella]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Added default value handling for empty poll options in the poll context.

• Style

  • Minor CSS adjustments in DesktopPoll and ParticipantRowForm components to improve layout consistency.

• Refactor

  • Improved logic for handling start times in the backend polls function.

These changes enhance the user experience by ensuring default values are set when no poll options are available and improving the visual layout of poll components.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
app	🔄 Building (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	May 19, 2024 0:10am
landing	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	May 19, 2024 0:10am

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The recent updates primarily focus on enhancing the functionality and styling of poll-related components in the web application. Key changes include adding conditional checks for empty poll options, refining CSS classes for better UI consistency, and modifying backend logic for start time assignments in polls. These adjustments aim to improve user experience and code maintainability.

Changes

File Path	Summary
apps/web/src/components/poll-context.tsx	Added a conditional check to return a default value if the pollOptions array is empty.
apps/web/src/components/poll/desktop-poll.tsx	Minor change in the table element's class name to include an extra space after border-spacing-0.
.../desktop-poll/participant-row-form.tsx	Modified CSS class in td element to include h-12 for consistent height.
.../desktop-poll/participant-row.tsx	Updated className attribute in ParticipantRowView to include h-12.
packages/backend/trpc/routers/polls.ts	Adjusted logic for assigning startTime and removed start assignment to a Date object.

In the world of code, we made a tweak,
To handle polls both strong and weak.
With heights adjusted and times refined,
Our user experience is redefined.
🐇✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 533e347 and 6e55451.

Files selected for processing (5)

• apps/web/src/components/poll-context.tsx (1 hunks)
• apps/web/src/components/poll/desktop-poll.tsx (1 hunks)
• apps/web/src/components/poll/desktop-poll/participant-row-form.tsx (1 hunks)
• apps/web/src/components/poll/desktop-poll/participant-row.tsx (1 hunks)
• packages/backend/trpc/routers/polls.ts (2 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• apps/web/src/components/poll/desktop-poll.tsx

Additional comments not posted (4)

apps/web/src/components/poll/desktop-poll/participant-row.tsx (1)

41-41: LGTM! The addition of h-12 ensures consistent row height across components.

apps/web/src/components/poll/desktop-poll/participant-row-form.tsx (1)

57-57: LGTM! The addition of h-12 ensures consistent row height across components.

apps/web/src/components/poll-context.tsx (1)

175-179: LGTM! The conditional check for empty pollOptions enhances robustness by handling edge cases effectively.

packages/backend/trpc/routers/polls.ts (1)

Line range hint 1-1: Please provide more details or context about the changes related to start and startTime as they are not directly visible in the provided code.

Verification successful

---

The changes related to start and startTime in the polls.ts file have been verified. The instances of start and startTime align with the summary description, indicating modifications in their assignments and usage.

• Lines involving start and startTime include date manipulations and assignments, consistent with the described changes.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify changes related to `start` and `startTime` in `polls.ts`.

# Test: Search for the usage of `start` and `startTime`. Expect: Changes should align with the summary description.
rg --type typescript --files-with-matches 'start|startTime' packages/backend/trpc/routers/polls.ts

Length of output: 135

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify changes related to `start` and `startTime` in `polls.ts`.

# Test: Search for the usage of `start` and `startTime`. Expect: Changes should align with the summary description.
rg --type ts --files-with-matches 'start|startTime' packages/backend/trpc/routers/polls.ts

Length of output: 131

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract lines containing `start` and `startTime` in `polls.ts`.

# Test: Display lines with `start` and `startTime` to verify changes.
rg --type ts 'start|startTime' packages/backend/trpc/routers/polls.ts

Length of output: 1204