Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sauron: use as fallback #214

Open
3nprob opened this issue Feb 1, 2021 · 4 comments · Fixed by #248
Open

sauron: use as fallback #214

3nprob opened this issue Feb 1, 2021 · 4 comments · Fixed by #248

Comments

@3nprob
Copy link

3nprob commented Feb 1, 2021

It would be super cool if sauron could be configured to either use the Esplora backend or bitcoind as primary/fallback - thus it can give higher robustness by adding redundancy.

vincenzopalazzo added a commit to vincenzopalazzo/plugins that referenced this issue Jun 5, 2021
The bitcoin backend plugin is inspired by lightningd#112 lightningd#214

Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <[email protected]>
vincenzopalazzo added a commit to vincenzopalazzo/plugins that referenced this issue Jun 5, 2021
The bitcoin backend plugin is inspired by lightningd#112 lightningd#214

Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <[email protected]>
vincenzopalazzo added a commit to vincenzopalazzo/plugins that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2021
The bitcoin backend plugin is inspired by lightningd#112 lightningd#214

Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <[email protected]>
cdecker pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 25, 2021
The bitcoin backend plugin is inspired by #112 #214

Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <[email protected]>
@darosior
Copy link
Member

I don't think this should be closed. #248 did not address this issue.

@vincenzopalazzo
Copy link
Collaborator

I don't think this should be closed. #248 did not address this issue.

Hi @darosior,

Mh, I'm not able to catch the motivation on why this issue is not addressed in the PR. The java plugin does exactly what the issue describes, the only difference with sauron Is that is written in Java with an OOP paradigm and with a little bit more attention to be failure resistant.

I'm missing some things here? if yes, I'm sorry about that

@darosior
Copy link
Member

Well, i think that it's great to have different backends to pick from but this issue was specifically related to Sauron whereas #248 adds a link to an alternative backend hence these are different issues

@vincenzopalazzo
Copy link
Collaborator

@darosior Make sense :-) It is my fault here.

I thought more about addressing the issue that this issue is asking and not how :).

I don't think this should be closed. #248 did not address this issue.

ack, maybe you or @m-schmoock can reopen the issue?

@m-schmoock m-schmoock reopened this Jun 25, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants