-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🔨 (version): Move firmware version from build_firmware script to Makefile #1023
🔨 (version): Move firmware version from build_firmware script to Makefile #1023
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #1023 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 96.03% 96.03%
========================================
Files 133 133
Lines 3106 3106
========================================
Hits 2983 2983
Misses 123 123 📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
File comparision analysis report🔖 Info
Click to show memory sections
📝 SummaryClick to show summary
🗺️ Map files diff outputClick to show diff listNo differenes where found in map files. |
fadf1dc
to
50e14bf
Compare
File comparision analysis report🔖 Info
Click to show memory sections
📝 SummaryClick to show summary
🗺️ Map files diff outputClick to show diff listNo differenes where found in map files. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the PR, LGTM 👍
I like the fact that we are using make firmware
but the version itself should be defined in a config file, not in the Makefile
082c5a3
to
5872cec
Compare
This pull request introduces 2 alerts when merging 5872cec into acc530d - view on LGTM.com new alerts:
|
Suggest that build come in another PR |
5872cec
to
78c784d
Compare
This pull request introduces 2 alerts when merging 78c784d into acc530d - view on LGTM.com new alerts:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the changes, this is much better 👍
I find the python script a bit over engineered/complicated to be honest.
I'm not sure we need to pass arguments, especially the standards, and even the input could be hardcoded (see my comment about using a path instead of the string for CI)
The checks are quite simple, super fast, so scripting/functional programming should be preferred to OOP.
Let's discuss that on Monday :)
This pull request introduces 3 alerts when merging c24af36 into fb30049 - view on LGTM.com new alerts:
|
c24af36
to
8a9b906
Compare
This pull request introduces 2 alerts when merging 8a9b906 into fb30049 - view on LGTM.com new alerts:
|
8a9b906
to
d5861e8
Compare
This pull request introduces 2 alerts when merging d5861e8 into 3e90d9b - view on LGTM.com new alerts:
|
|
…file - Add regex to check format of version - Add script to check version is compliant with semver and mcuboot
d5861e8
to
f316175
Compare
This pull request introduces 2 alerts when merging f316175 into 3e90d9b - view on LGTM.com new alerts:
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! |
application-signed
file + robot with github CI on 20/09/2022Add regex to check format of version
Suggest that build come in another PR