Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: more mul lemmas for Nat #198

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 11, 2024
Merged

Conversation

fgdorais
Copy link
Collaborator

@fgdorais fgdorais commented Jul 23, 2023

The major changes here are deprecating lemmas with obscure names: Nat.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left, Nat.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right, Nat.mul_lt_mul, Nat.mul_lt_mul'.

This PR also finally implements #118 as Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_lt.

@fgdorais fgdorais mentioned this pull request Jul 23, 2023
3 tasks
@fgdorais fgdorais force-pushed the nat-mul branch 2 times, most recently from 76451bb to d8834f8 Compare July 24, 2023 14:09
@fgdorais fgdorais added the awaiting-author Waiting for PR author to address issues label Aug 21, 2023
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added the merge-conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the `main` branch which must be resolved by the author. label Oct 19, 2023
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot removed the merge-conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the `main` branch which must be resolved by the author. label Nov 1, 2023
@fgdorais fgdorais added awaiting-review This PR is ready for review; the author thinks it is ready to be merged. and removed awaiting-author Waiting for PR author to address issues labels Nov 1, 2023
@digama0 digama0 added awaiting-author Waiting for PR author to address issues and removed awaiting-review This PR is ready for review; the author thinks it is ready to be merged. labels Nov 1, 2023
@fgdorais fgdorais added awaiting-review This PR is ready for review; the author thinks it is ready to be merged. and removed awaiting-author Waiting for PR author to address issues labels Nov 2, 2023
Potentially breaking:

* Deprecated `Nat.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left`.
* Deprecated `Nat.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right`.
* Deprecated `Nat.mul_lt_mul`.
* Deprecated `Nat.mul_lt_mul'`.
* Some implicit parameters may have been renamed or reordered.
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added the merge-conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the `main` branch which must be resolved by the author. label Nov 28, 2023
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot removed the merge-conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the `main` branch which must be resolved by the author. label Dec 9, 2023
@fgdorais fgdorais added WIP work in progress and removed awaiting-review This PR is ready for review; the author thinks it is ready to be merged. labels Dec 9, 2023
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added the merge-conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the `main` branch which must be resolved by the author. label Dec 10, 2023
@fgdorais fgdorais removed the WIP work in progress label Dec 10, 2023
@fgdorais fgdorais added the awaiting-review This PR is ready for review; the author thinks it is ready to be merged. label Dec 10, 2023
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot removed the merge-conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the `main` branch which must be resolved by the author. label Dec 10, 2023
@joehendrix joehendrix requested a review from kim-em January 10, 2024 22:48
@kim-em
Copy link
Collaborator

kim-em commented Jan 11, 2024

(Joe asked that I merge this after reviewing; I'm happy now, so about to hit merge.)

@kim-em kim-em merged commit 0b2e962 into leanprover-community:main Jan 11, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting-review This PR is ready for review; the author thinks it is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants