Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

prepare 3.2.4 release #18

Merged
merged 101 commits into from
Mar 18, 2020
Merged

prepare 3.2.4 release #18

merged 101 commits into from
Mar 18, 2020

Conversation

LaunchDarklyCI
Copy link
Contributor

@LaunchDarklyCI LaunchDarklyCI commented Mar 18, 2020

[3.2.4] - 2020-03-18

Fixed:

  • Some users reported an error where the SDK said that the content type of a response was "application/json, application/json; charset=utf8". It is invalid to have multiple Content-Type values in a response and the LaunchDarkly service does not do this, but an improperly configured proxy/gateway might add such a header. Now the SDK will tolerate a value like this as long as it starts with "application/json".

eli-darkly and others added 30 commits October 29, 2019 17:51
Update babel config to work in `test` without `useBuiltIns`
initial move of code from js-client-sdk-private
use spread operator instead of Object.assign
re-add deprecation comment on samplingInterval
eli-darkly and others added 26 commits January 30, 2020 15:23
change exact dependencies to best-compatible
# Conflicts:
#	src/EventSender.js
#	src/__tests__/EventSender-test.js
#	src/__tests__/configuration-test.js
# Conflicts:
#	package-lock.json
#	package.json
fix updating secure mode hash with identify()
don't omit streamInits.failed when it's false
clean up init state logic, prevent unhandled rejections
less strict matching of json content-type header
@eli-darkly eli-darkly requested a review from bwoskow-ld March 18, 2020 17:30
@LaunchDarklyCI LaunchDarklyCI merged commit 9cae2b7 into master Mar 18, 2020
@LaunchDarklyCI LaunchDarklyCI deleted the release-3.2.4 branch March 18, 2020 17:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants