Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[pt] Added AP to rule ID:GENERAL_VERB_AGREEMENT_ERRORS #11146

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 31, 2024

Conversation

marcoagpinto
Copy link
Member

@marcoagpinto marcoagpinto commented Dec 31, 2024

Added an antipattern.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced Portuguese grammar checking with a new rule group for verb agreement errors
    • Added advanced antipattern detection for identifying grammatical inconsistencies in verb usage

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new rule group titled "Concordância Verbal: Geral" (General Verb Agreement) in the Portuguese language module's grammar.xml file. The addition focuses on enhancing grammar checking capabilities by defining an antipattern that identifies and handles verb agreement errors. The new rule group includes specific token patterns and exceptions to detect grammatical inconsistencies in verb usage, with the aim of improving the language tool's ability to recognize and flag potential verb agreement mistakes in Portuguese.

Changes

File Change Summary
languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/rules/pt/grammar.xml Added new rule group GENERAL_VERB_AGREEMENT_ERRORS with an antipattern for detecting verb agreement errors

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • jaumeortola

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/rules/pt/grammar.xml (1)

9119-9127: Consider adding examples with different verb tenses

While the current examples are good, consider adding cases with:

  • Present perfect (pretérito perfeito composto)
  • Future tense
  • Conditional mood
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c0ed29c and 83d27c8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/rules/pt/grammar.xml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/rules/pt/grammar.xml (4)

9110-9112: LGTM: Rule group declaration follows conventions

The rule group is properly declared with a descriptive ID and appropriate name in Portuguese.


9113-9118: LGTM: Well-structured token pattern for coordinated subjects

The antipattern correctly handles the Portuguese grammar rule for coordinated subjects with "nem...nem" construction, using appropriate part-of-speech tags and regular expressions.


9128-9129: LGTM: Clear handling of mesoclisis cases

The antipattern correctly handles mesoclisis with appropriate spacing rules and helpful documentation.


9110-9129: Verify similar patterns in other Romance language modules

Let's check if similar verb agreement patterns exist in other Romance language modules for consistency.

✅ Verification successful

Let me generate another verification script to check for verb agreement patterns in Romance language modules more effectively.


Let me try one more verification script to check the specific patterns in other Romance language modules more effectively.


Based on the verification results, I can now provide the final response:

Similar verb agreement patterns exist in Romance languages with some variations

The verification shows that verb agreement patterns are handled differently across Romance languages:

  • Spanish has subject-verb agreement rules under AGREEMENT_SUBJECT_VERB categories
  • French has verb agreement rules like ACCORD_VERBE_PPA for past participle agreement
  • The nem...nem (neither...nor) pattern in Portuguese appears to be properly handled with antipatterns to avoid false positives

The current implementation in Portuguese aligns well with other Romance language modules, each adapting the rules to their specific grammar requirements while maintaining consistency in the overall approach to verb agreement checking.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar verb agreement patterns in other Romance language modules
echo "Searching for similar patterns in other Romance language modules..."
fd . "languagetool-language-modules/(es|fr|it|ca|gl)/src/main/resources" -t f -e xml | xargs rg -l "VERB_AGREEMENT"

# Check for specific nem...nem patterns in Portuguese
echo "Checking for other nem...nem patterns in Portuguese rules..."
rg -A 2 "nem.*nem" "languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources"

Length of output: 31666


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for verb agreement patterns in Romance language modules
echo "Searching in Spanish grammar rules..."
rg -A 2 "concordancia.*verbo|verbo.*concordancia" "languagetool-language-modules/es/src/main/resources" || true

echo -e "\nSearching in French grammar rules..."
rg -A 2 "accord.*verbe|verbe.*accord" "languagetool-language-modules/fr/src/main/resources" || true

echo -e "\nSearching in Italian grammar rules..."
rg -A 2 "concordanza.*verbo|verbo.*concordanza" "languagetool-language-modules/it/src/main/resources" || true

echo -e "\nSearching in Galician grammar rules..."
rg -A 2 "concordancia.*verbo|verbo.*concordancia" "languagetool-language-modules/gl/src/main/resources" || true

echo -e "\nSearching for verb agreement rule IDs in Romance languages..."
fd . "languagetool-language-modules/(es|fr|it|gl)/src/main/resources" -t f -e xml | xargs rg "id=.*VERB.*AGREEMENT|id=.*CONCORDANCIA.*VERB"

Length of output: 87164


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for verb agreement patterns in Romance languages with correct paths
echo "Searching in Spanish grammar rules..."
rg -A 2 "VERB_AGREEMENT|CONCORDANCIA_VERBO" "languagetool-language-modules/es/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/rules/es/grammar.xml" || true

echo -e "\nSearching in French grammar rules..."
rg -A 2 "ACCORD_VERBE|VERBE_ACCORD" "languagetool-language-modules/fr/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/rules/fr/grammar.xml" || true

echo -e "\nSearching in Italian grammar rules..."
rg -A 2 "CONCORDANZA_VERBO|VERBO_CONCORDANZA" "languagetool-language-modules/it/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/rules/it/grammar.xml" || true

echo -e "\nSearching in Galician grammar rules..."
rg -A 2 "CONCORDANCIA_VERBO|VERBO_CONCORDANCIA" "languagetool-language-modules/gl/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/rules/gl/grammar.xml" || true

# Also check for nem...nem patterns in Portuguese
echo -e "\nChecking for nem...nem patterns in Portuguese grammar..."
rg -A 2 "nem.*nem" "languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/rules/pt/grammar.xml"

Length of output: 2121

@marcoagpinto marcoagpinto merged commit bb6fc38 into master Dec 31, 2024
5 checks passed
@marcoagpinto marcoagpinto deleted the lt_marcoagpinto_20241231_0751 branch December 31, 2024 09:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant