-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 337
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add MADR about new features/experiments lifecycle #8290
Comments
This issue was inactive for 90 days. It will be reviewed in the next triage meeting and might be closed. |
This issue was inactive for 90 days. It will be reviewed in the next triage meeting and might be closed. |
This issue was inactive for 90 days. It will be reviewed in the next triage meeting and might be closed. |
This issue was inactive for 90 days. It will be reviewed in the next triage meeting and might be closed. |
Description
We usually add new features/change of behaviours through "experiments".
We don't have a good practice around how experiments land as default.
Let's codify this in a MADR.
IMO here's what we should do:
experimental
with a value offalse
true
This MADR should also make a difference between rewrites which should have experimental booleans and features that should just be added in the config.
For example we have ExperimentalKDSEventBasedWatchdog. It's unfortunate because if we were to make it not an experiment we'd need to ask people using it to change their config to adopt it.
This MADR should ensure we make it as easy as possible for people to adopt experiments and never need to change configs if the experiment is a success.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: