-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add v1.4.0 perf and scale benchmarks data #13204
Conversation
Hi @Sreeja1725. Thanks for your PR. PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
b09a937
to
a1e0a86
Compare
/cc |
704ee0d
to
2d5f7ee
Compare
/cc @alaypatel07 |
adding reviewers from sig-scale, removing others to stop the spamming /cc @rthallisey |
/ok-to-test |
|
||
NOTE: The scalability metrics were hampered by a bug, that was fixed before the release [here](https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/pull/12096). Hence the scalability metrics data needs to be re-evaluated by users with the bug fix to get a more accurate benchmarks | ||
Note: virt-api and virt-controller memory usage is being collected from June 27th |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are the changes in data in CPU graphs related to the promql bugfix?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have added only the avg cpu and memory graphs in this doc, those are not related to bugfix.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added one question if clarification regarding bugfix is required. Apart from this the PR LGTM. Thanks @Sreeja1725
/lgtm |
/cherry-pick release-1.4 |
@alaypatel07: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
93c9a67
to
be3ccf8
Compare
Signed-off-by: svarnam <[email protected]>
be3ccf8
to
0394e7e
Compare
/retest-required |
/approve |
/lgtm |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: rthallisey, xpivarc The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Required labels detected, running phase 2 presubmits: |
@alaypatel07: new pull request created: #13217 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
What this PR does
After this PR: This PR adds the perf and scale benchmarks data for release v1.4.0
Why we need it and why it was done in this way
The following tradeoffs were made:
The following alternatives were considered:
Links to places where the discussion took place:
Special notes for your reviewer
Checklist
This checklist is not enforcing, but it's a reminder of items that could be relevant to every PR.
Approvers are expected to review this list.
Release note