bump multus to v4.1.0

[kubevirt-bot]

bump multus to v4.1.0
Executed by Bumper script

bump multus to v4.1.0

[kubevirt-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign qinqon for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[oshoval]

/hold

multus bump is broken here
#1847

and we dont have yet the lanes for this release

[oshoval]

https://prow.ci.kubevirt.io/view/gs/kubevirt-prow/pr-logs/pull/kubevirt_cluster-network-addons-operator/1864/pull-e2e-cnao-macvtap-cni-functests-release-0.95/1824053768279298048

might be real bug due to the bump

maybe MacVtap should be static ? (there is a PR for that)
#1862

[kubevirt-bot]

@kubevirt-bot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
pull-e2e-cnao-macvtap-cni-functests-release-0.95	fc5a62f	link	true	/test pull-e2e-cnao-macvtap-cni-functests-release-0.95
pull-e2e-cnao-ovs-cni-functests-release-0.95	fc5a62f	link	true	/test pull-e2e-cnao-ovs-cni-functests-release-0.95

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[RamLavi]

https://prow.ci.kubevirt.io/view/gs/kubevirt-prow/pr-logs/pull/kubevirt_cluster-network-addons-operator/1864/pull-e2e-cnao-macvtap-cni-functests-release-0.95/1824053768279298048

might be real bug due to the bump

maybe MacVtap should be static ? (there is a PR for that) #1862

@maiqueb ?

[oshoval]

https://prow.ci.kubevirt.io/view/gs/kubevirt-prow/pr-logs/pull/kubevirt_cluster-network-addons-operator/1864/pull-e2e-cnao-macvtap-cni-functests-release-0.95/1824053768279298048
might be real bug due to the bump
maybe MacVtap should be static ? (there is a PR for that) #1862

@maiqueb ?

better have it first on main, as on the release it is going to be static right ? (i.e no auto bump iiuc)
I will open an issue once it appears on main bump
Issue will allow to track it better as you also suggested offline in other case lately

[oshoval]

/close

if the error return on main we can open an issue imo
EDIT - updated this ticket #1858