Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can't manage DNS records on GoDaddy for domains registered elsewhere #3888

Closed
m-adawi opened this issue Aug 22, 2023 · 8 comments
Closed

Can't manage DNS records on GoDaddy for domains registered elsewhere #3888

m-adawi opened this issue Aug 22, 2023 · 8 comments
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug.

Comments

@m-adawi
Copy link
Contributor

m-adawi commented Aug 22, 2023

What happened:
I was trying to have external-dns manage DNS records on GoDaddy for a domain that is registered outside of GoDaddy with GoDaddy acting as a nameserver. However, external-dns doesn't even see that this domain is in my GoDaddy account.

As you can see, I have a domain registered on another DNS registrar but I manage its dns records on GoDaddy
Screenshot from 2023-08-22 22-46-32

As to why I'm doing this, simply because GoDaddy has all of our domains except for this one that has an extension that isn't supported on GoDaddy
Screenshot from 2023-08-22 20-13-13-masked

What you expected to happen:
I expected external-dns to create DNS records for services and ingresses with hostnames that fall under a domain with DNS records managed by GoDaddy but is registered elsewhere.

How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible):
Have a domain registered outside of GoDaddy and try to manage its dns records on GoDaddy

Environment:

  • External-DNS version: v0.13.5
  • DNS provider: godaddy
@m-adawi m-adawi added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Aug 22, 2023
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 26, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Feb 25, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue with /reopen
  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close not-planned

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned".

In response to this:

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue with /reopen
  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close not-planned

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Mar 26, 2024
@m-adawi
Copy link
Contributor Author

m-adawi commented Apr 21, 2024

/reopen

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot reopened this Apr 21, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@m-adawi: Reopened this issue.

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@m-adawi
Copy link
Contributor Author

m-adawi commented Apr 21, 2024

/remove-lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Apr 21, 2024
@m-adawi
Copy link
Contributor Author

m-adawi commented Apr 28, 2024

Sorry I just noticed that #3889 was merged

@m-adawi m-adawi closed this as completed Apr 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants