🌱 Bump sigs.k8s.io/cluster-api from 1.4.1 to 1.6.0

[alexandrevilain]

What this PR does / why we need it:

Bump ClusterAPI to v1.6.0 to support ipam v1beta1 API. When upgrading CAPI dependency it updated controller-runtime too. This makes the codebase compatible with latest controller-runtime breaking changes.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #218

[k8s-ci-robot]

Welcome @alexandrevilain!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-ipam-provider-in-cluster 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-ipam-provider-in-cluster has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

[alexandrevilain]

PR has been updated, some tests were failing due to the new API version.

[alexandrevilain]

Hi @schrej !
Thanks for helping with the linter!
Maybe we can try upgrading golangci-lint version defined here: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-ipam-provider-in-cluster/pull/219/files#diff-07d34da07a494684d43f3913691db42dcba222ed24f5f1b7eff47eb3d1fc8ee6R21 to v1.55.2 ? :)

[schrej]

Hah, yesterday evening I wanted to start working on the 1.6 upgrade and went to find my PR for 1.5 to get the branch name, and then saw your PR. I started to work on fixing the tests and continued this morning, pushed, and then noticed you've already fixed it as well 😄

Thank you!

/lgtm
/approve

Not sure why the linter is not running properly, it's fine locally now.

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alexandrevilain, schrej

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [schrej]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[schrej]

@alexandrevilain ah, that seems to have done the trick. Was on that version locally as well 🤦

merci!

/lgtm