-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
leaderelection add context #44
Conversation
Hi @aimuz. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-csi member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Unknown CLA label state. Rechecking for CLA labels. Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
/check-cla |
/assign @msau42 |
leaderelection/leader_election.go
Outdated
@@ -174,7 +181,10 @@ func (l *leaderElection) Run() error { | |||
}, | |||
} | |||
|
|||
leaderelection.RunOrDie(context.TODO(), leaderConfig) | |||
if l.ctx == nil { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: I don't like that it modifies l
here. I can't quite nail it, but it feels wrong.
Also, why "context.TODO()"? That implies that the code needs further work. What is that missing work? If this is final, use `context.Background()'. If not, explain what needs to be done.
I'd prefer:
ctx := l.ctx
if ctx == nil {
ctx = context.Background()
}
leaderelection.RunOrDie(ctx, leaderConfig)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
use "context.TODO()" because it was like this before, but now it seems to be true "context.Background()" better.
I have recommitted the code
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: aimuz, pohly The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
Add context
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: