Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: shield guard issues #790

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 17, 2024

Conversation

umagnus
Copy link
Contributor

@umagnus umagnus commented Jun 13, 2024

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

Fix shield guard issues

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Requirements:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

none

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jun 13, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @umagnus. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-csi member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 13, 2024
@andyzhangx
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jun 13, 2024
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 13, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9495256458

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 79.093%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9386387394: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 942
Relevant Lines: 1191

💛 - Coveralls

@andyzhangx
Copy link
Member

/retest

2 similar comments
@andyzhangx
Copy link
Member

/retest

@umagnus
Copy link
Contributor Author

umagnus commented Jun 14, 2024

/retest

@umagnus umagnus force-pushed the security-context branch from 245862f to 294b274 Compare June 14, 2024 02:36
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 14, 2024
@umagnus umagnus changed the title Fix shield guard issues for KSM Fix shield guard issues Jun 14, 2024
@andyzhangx andyzhangx changed the title Fix shield guard issues fix: shield guard issues Jun 14, 2024
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 14, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9509764069

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 79.093%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9386387394: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 942
Relevant Lines: 1191

💛 - Coveralls

@umagnus umagnus force-pushed the security-context branch from 294b274 to d2ea6da Compare June 17, 2024 03:29
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 17, 2024
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 17, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9541511628

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 79.093%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9528420648: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 942
Relevant Lines: 1191

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Member

@andyzhangx andyzhangx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 17, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: andyzhangx, umagnus

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 17, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 943001a into kubernetes-csi:master Jun 17, 2024
21 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants