Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FAQ overhaul #3102

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 6, 2022
Merged

FAQ overhaul #3102

merged 4 commits into from
May 6, 2022

Conversation

bgrant0607
Copy link
Contributor

Take into account the larger scope of kpt and eliminate some of the smaller technical details.

cc @justinsb @selfmanagingresource

Take into account the larger scope of kpt and eliminate some of the smaller technical details.

- You can use packaging without declaring functions
- You can use imperative functions to operate on vanilla directories of k8s
- You can use imperative functions to operate on vanilla directories of Kubernetes
resources
- You can use apply logic without buying into full the packaging story (still
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oops, "the full packaging story"

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. Fixed

bgrant0607 added 2 commits May 6, 2022 12:00
This page was stale
@bgrant0607 bgrant0607 merged commit 6966150 into main May 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants