Added result methods #3
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces new methods to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant GojaRuntime
participant RuntimeRegistry
Client->>GojaRuntime: Request execution
GojaRuntime->>RuntimeRegistry: Execute and log results
RuntimeRegistry-->>GojaRuntime: Return execution results
GojaRuntime->>Client: Return actionResult with logs and context
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
registry/runtimeRegistry.go (2)
61-63: LGTM! Consider adding documentation for new methods.The new methods
GetConsoleLog(),GetConsoleError(), andGetContext()are valuable additions to theResultinterface, providing more detailed information about execution results. This can greatly enhance debugging and analysis capabilities.To improve code maintainability and usability, consider adding documentation comments for each new method, explaining their purpose and expected usage. For example:
// GetConsoleLog returns the console log entries from the execution. GetConsoleLog() []interface{} // GetConsoleError returns the console error messages from the execution. GetConsoleError() []interface{} // GetContext returns the contextual data associated with the execution. GetContext() map[string]interface{}
61-63: Consider type safety implications of usinginterface{}While using
interface{}provides flexibility, it may lead to type assertion issues if not handled carefully by consumers of this interface.Consider the following alternatives to enhance type safety:
- If the types of log entries and context values are known, use more specific types instead of
interface{}.- If flexibility is necessary, consider using generics (if using Go 1.18+) to provide type safety at compile-time.
- Provide helper methods or documentation to guide users on how to safely type assert the returned values.
Example using generics:
type Result[T any] interface { GetExitResult() T GetConsoleLog() []T GetConsoleError() []T GetContext() map[string]T }This approach would allow users to specify the expected types when implementing or using the
Resultinterface.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- gojaRuntime/gojaRuntime.go (1 hunks)
- registry/runtimeRegistry.go (1 hunks)
- runtime_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
runtime_test.go (1)
54-54: New assertion validates workflow settings.The added assertion checks for the
resetClaimssetting defined in the workflow code. This is a good practice as it ensures that the runtime correctly exposes the workflow settings in the execution context.gojaRuntime/gojaRuntime.go (4)
28-31: LGTM: GetConsoleError method implementationThe
GetConsoleErrormethod is correctly implemented. It adheres to theruntime_registry.Resultinterface and provides a straightforward getter for theConsoleErrorfield.
33-36: LGTM: GetConsoleLog method implementationThe
GetConsoleLogmethod is correctly implemented. It adheres to theruntime_registry.Resultinterface and provides a straightforward getter for theConsoleLogfield.
38-41: LGTM: GetContext method implementationThe
GetContextmethod is correctly implemented. It adheres to theruntime_registry.Resultinterface and provides a straightforward getter for theContextfield.
28-41: Summary: New accessor methods for actionResultThe changes introduce three new methods (
GetConsoleError,GetConsoleLog, andGetContext) to theactionResultstruct, implementing theruntime_registry.Resultinterface. These additions provide a clean and consistent way to access the internal data of theactionResult.To ensure these changes don't introduce any regressions, please run the following script to check for any direct access to these fields that might need to be updated:
If the script returns any results, consider updating those occurrences to use the new getter methods instead.
Verification successful
Verification Successful: No Direct Access Found
The shell script confirmed that there are no direct accesses to
ConsoleError,ConsoleLog, orContextfields of theactionResultstruct outside ofgojaRuntime/gojaRuntime.go. This ensures that the newly introduced accessor methods are being used consistently across the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for direct access to ConsoleError, ConsoleLog, and Context fields of actionResult # Test: Search for direct access to these fields echo "Checking for direct access to actionResult fields:" rg --type go 'actionResult\s*\.\s*(ConsoleError|ConsoleLog|Context)' --glob '!gojaRuntime/gojaRuntime.go'Length of output: 218
| @@ -51,4 +51,5 @@ func Test_GojaRuntime(t *testing.T) { | |||
| assert := assert.New(t) | |||
| assert.Nil(err) | |||
| assert.Equal("fetch response", fmt.Sprintf("%v", result.GetExitResult())) | |||
| assert.Equal(true, result.GetContext()["workflowSettings"].(map[string]interface{})["resetClaims"]) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider enhancing test robustness and coverage.
While the new assertion correctly validates the resetClaims setting, consider the following improvements:
-
Use safer type assertions to prevent potential panics:
workflowSettings, ok := result.GetContext()["workflowSettings"].(map[string]interface{}) assert.True(ok, "workflowSettings should be a map") resetClaims, ok := workflowSettings["resetClaims"].(bool) assert.True(ok, "resetClaims should be a boolean") assert.True(resetClaims, "resetClaims should be true")
-
Add assertions for other aspects of the execution result:
assert.Contains(result.GetConsoleLogs(), "logging from workflow", "Console log should contain expected message") assert.Contains(result.GetConsoleErrors(), "error", "Console errors should contain expected message")
These additions would improve the test's robustness and coverage of the new result methods.
Explain your changes
Suppose there is a related issue with enough detail for a reviewer to understand your changes fully. In that case, you can omit an explanation and instead include either “Fixes #XX” or “Updates #XX” where “XX” is the issue number.
Checklist
🛟 If you need help, consider asking for advice over in the Kinde community.