Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove einops dep #2006

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mattdangerw
Copy link
Member

@mattdangerw mattdangerw commented Dec 5, 2024

We shouldn't add a new dependency for just two reshape calls. We can do this the less readable way for now.

We shouldn't add a new dependency for just to reshape calls. We can
do this the less readable way for now.
@mattdangerw
Copy link
Member Author

The bug is that this dependency is imported unconditionally, but not a actual pip depedency of the package. But I think the right solution is to avoid the new depedency for now. This is not important enough of a usage to warrant a new library dep.

@mattdangerw mattdangerw merged commit cefc7b6 into keras-team:master Dec 5, 2024
10 of 11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants