Documentation: Copy editing, this and that #579
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces documentation updates and minor improvements across several files in the Responder project. Changes include clarifying text in README and documentation files, updating the changelog for version 3.0.0, modifying development setup instructions, and adding a new documentation dependency. The modifications focus on improving readability, updating support for Python versions, and streamlining the project's documentation and installation process. Changes
Poem
Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
docs/source/changes.md (3)
Line range hint
9-9: Update unreleased version linkThe version comparison link at the bottom of the file needs to be updated for the unreleased version to point to v3.0.0.
-[unreleased]: https://github.com/taoufik07/responder/compare/v2.0.5..HEAD +[unreleased]: https://github.com/taoufik07/responder/compare/v3.0.0..HEAD
Line range hint
11-11: Add version comparison link for v3.0.0The version comparison link for v3.0.0 needs to be added to the bottom of the file.
+[v3.0.0]: https://github.com/taoufik07/responder/compare/v2.0.5..v3.0.0
Line range hint
34-42: Enhance extension migration instructionsThe breaking changes around extensions should include migration instructions for existing users.
Consider adding a migration guide section:
from responder.ext.openapi import OpenAPISchema
+Migration guide for existing users:
+python +# Before +from responder import cli, GraphQLView, OpenAPISchema + +# After +from responder.ext.cli import cli +from responder.ext.graphql import GraphQLView +from responder.ext.openapi import OpenAPISchema +</blockquote></details> <details> <summary>docs/source/backlog.md (2)</summary><blockquote> `9-10`: **Enhance clarity of helloworld.py task** The task description for the helloworld.py example could be more specific about the problem it's solving. ```diff -Add `index.html` to standard `helloworld.py` example, -so that the user does not receive a 404 Not Found. +Add `index.html` to the standard `helloworld.py` example, +so that users accessing the root URL ("/") do not receive a 404 Not Found error.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~9-~9: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...responder.ext. - Addindex.htmlto standardhelloworld.pyexample, so that the ...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
4-5: Add target dates for releasesConsider adding target dates or milestones for both the dev and GA releases of 3.0.0 to help track progress.
-Release 3.0.0 dev -Release 3.0.0 GA +Release 3.0.0 dev (Target: Q1 2024) +Release 3.0.0 GA (Target: Q2 2024)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
README.md(1 hunks)docs/source/backlog.md(1 hunks)docs/source/changes.md(1 hunks)docs/source/index.rst(4 hunks)docs/source/sandbox.md(1 hunks)setup.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/source/backlog.md
[uncategorized] ~9-~9: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ... responder.ext. - Add index.html to standard helloworld.py example, so that the ...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
- GitHub Check: Full: Python pypy3.10 on windows-latest
- GitHub Check: Full: Python pypy3.10 on macos-latest
- GitHub Check: Full: Python 3.13 on macos-latest
- GitHub Check: Full: Python 3.12 on macos-latest
- GitHub Check: Full: Python 3.11 on macos-latest
- GitHub Check: Full: Python pypy3.10 on macos-13
🔇 Additional comments (10)
setup.py (1)
140-140: LGTM! Good addition for documentation development.Adding
sphinx-autobuildto the docs extras is a valuable improvement that will enhance the documentation development workflow by automatically rebuilding docs when changes are detected.docs/source/sandbox.md (1)
17-17: LGTM! Good practice to ensure latest dependencies.Adding the
--upgradeflag ensures developers always get the latest compatible versions of dependencies, which is particularly important for development environments.README.md (1)
15-15: LGTM! Improved clarity and readability.The rephrasing makes the text more concise and clearer while maintaining technical accuracy. Good separation of the Starlette reference from the async declaration note.
Also applies to: 18-21
docs/source/index.rst (5)
41-41: LGTM! Consistent with README improvements.The rephrasing maintains consistency with the README while improving clarity. Good separation of concepts for better readability.
Also applies to: 43-43, 47-47
72-72: LGTM! Better testimonials formatting.The reformatting of testimonials improves the visual structure without changing the content.
Also applies to: 78-78, 84-84
116-121: LGTM! Better organization of installation and development sections.Good separation of installation requirements from development setup instructions.
125-129: LGTM! Improved documentation structure.The reorganization of documentation sections provides a better hierarchy and navigation.
165-165: LGTM! Updated social media link.The Twitter/X handle has been updated to the correct one.
docs/source/changes.md (1)
Line range hint
11-11: Consider finalizing the release dateThe release date is currently set as "2024-11-xx". Consider either:
- Removing the date entirely until release
- Using a concrete date if the release date is known
docs/source/backlog.md (1)
6-7: Consider prioritizing documentation tasksThe task regarding
tour.rstvalidation contains multiple options but no clear decision path.Consider breaking this into subtasks:
- Validate current content of
tour.rst- Evaluate feasibility of doctest implementation
- Research MyST-NB conversion benefits
Would you like me to help create a detailed task breakdown for this documentation improvement?
What the title says.