Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Turn into more object oriented programming style where applicable (Run ID: kaspersgit_ml_2_sql_issue_51_2bfd1c88) #52

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

agentfarmx[bot]
Copy link

@agentfarmx agentfarmx bot commented Feb 27, 2025

agent_instance: kaspersgit_ml_2_sql_issue_51_2bfd1c88 Tries to fix: #51

🏗️ Refactoring: Enhanced code structure through object-oriented design

  • Added: Created BaseModel abstract class with standardized interface for all model implementations
  • Refactored: Converted functional approaches in ebm.py, decision_tree.py, and l_regression.py to class-based implementations
  • Improved: Implemented ModelFactory pattern and enhanced ModelCreator class for better separation of concerns

The codebase is now more maintainable, easier to extend with new model types, and follows OOP principles while maintaining full backward compatibility. Please review these structural improvements!

The commit refactors the modelcreater module to use object-oriented programming principles, introducing the ModelCreator class and a BaseModel abstract class for model implementations. This improves code organization, maintainability, and extensibility while maintaining backward compatibility through function wrappers for existing code.
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 27, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@kaspersgit
Copy link
Owner

Tests are failing, adjust the PR such that they will pass

This commit adds proper scikit-learn compatibility by implementing
`__sklearn_tags__` in BaseModel and model subclasses. It also adds direct
property accessors for model coefficients and improves model handling in
SQL generation utilities.
Copy link
Author

agentfarmx bot commented Feb 28, 2025

Fix: Resolved model compatibility issues in tests

This commit updates the model training functions and SQL generation scripts to seamlessly handle both direct scikit-learn models and our custom model wrappers. It also adds the necessary __sklearn_tags__ method and properties to the custom model classes for full compatibility with scikit-learn's estimator interface. Please review these changes!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Turn into more object oriented programming style where applicable
1 participant