-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 917
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
operator: add extra annotations for service of karmada apiserver #4679
operator: add extra annotations for service of karmada apiserver #4679
Conversation
ad2a3b2
to
1246777
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #4679 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 51.41% 51.39% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 250 250
Lines 24979 24979
==========================================
- Hits 12843 12839 -4
- Misses 11431 11433 +2
- Partials 705 707 +2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Signed-off-by: calvin <[email protected]>
1246777
to
739c4fa
Compare
@RainbowMango @chaosi-zju PTAL, thanks |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
Looks great! Thanks.
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: RainbowMango The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
add extra annotations for service of karmada apiserver.
details please see below issue:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #4634
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: