-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 919
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
proposal: pause ensure work object #1859
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
This week will be pretty rough for me as we are planning to cut the new release, I'm not sure I can take a look at this approach. But I've added this to the release-1.3 backlog. |
c517562
to
e94f4f2
Compare
|
||
## Summary | ||
|
||
When the resource (as known as `resource template`) paused field(such as label `work.karmada.io/paused`) is true, we hope that the latest change, whether it is workload or PP or OP, will not be updated to the work object until it becomes false |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The summary part should describe what the proposal is. e.g. Do you propose a work.karmada.io/paused
label?
## Motivation | ||
Users might add/replace/delete overriders for OP dynamically, and add/remove targetCluster in PP dynamically; | ||
These operations should be transactional, before all modifications are done, policy should not take effect |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The motivation
part focuses on the reason why raise the proposal and why people need it.
Signed-off-by: charlesQQ <[email protected]>
e94f4f2
to
4eb59f2
Compare
I'm going to revisit this proposal. |
I'm trying to figure out which PR/Issue should be included in the coming v1.7 release which is planned at the end of this month. |
#5217 fix this pr. |
/close |
@CharlesQQ: Closed this PR. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Signed-off-by: charlesQQ [email protected]
What type of PR is this?
/kind design
/kind documentation
What this PR does / why we need it:
pause ensure work object
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Part of #1567
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: