-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 930
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(docs): updated type of task steps page #1164
Conversation
PR Reviewer Guide 🔍Here are some key observations to aid the review process:
|
PR Code Suggestions ✨Explore these optional code suggestions:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
❌ Changes requested. Reviewed everything up to 0a02a82 in 1 minute and 59 seconds
More details
- Looked at
476
lines of code in8
files - Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
8
drafted comments based on config settings.
1. cookbooks/IDEAS.md:1
- Draft comment:
The newly added header block with the logo and badges looks consistent with other sections. Verify that the formatting renders correctly across devices. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
2. cookbooks/README.md:1
- Draft comment:
The updated header in the README (including the revised image with height and badge links) is clear and consistent. Ensure that all Colab links function as expected. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
3. documentation/docs/advanced/new-syntax.mdx:7
- Draft comment:
Heading levels and formatting have been adjusted for clarity. Double-check that the hierarchy (using '##' for main sections) remains logical throughout the document. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%
<= threshold50%
This comment is asking the PR author to double-check the hierarchy of sections in a document. It doesn't provide a specific suggestion or point out a specific issue, which violates the rule against asking the author to double-check things.
4. documentation/docs/advanced/types-of-task-steps.mdx:145
- Draft comment:
The new 'Subworkflow Step' section is a useful addition. In the YAML examples (especially in the foreach block), note that the removal of list markers (dashes) for step items may affect YAML array formatting. Verify that the task runner accepts this structure. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
5. documentation/docs/advanced/types-of-task-steps.mdx:275
- Draft comment:
The note on 'map-reduce' now clearly explains parallelism settings. Ensure that the requirement for 'parallelism: 1' in subworkflows is documented prominently so users don’t run into runtime errors. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
6. documentation/docs/concepts/tasks.mdx:98
- Draft comment:
The addition of the '[Subworkflow]' row in the tasks steps table improves clarity. The table now accurately reflects all available step types. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
7. documentation/mint.json:175
- Draft comment:
Navigation groupings have been updated in the mint.json file. Please double-check that the updated order of pages in the 'Advanced Topics' group (and others) matches the current documentation structure. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%
<= threshold50%
This comment is asking the PR author to double-check the order of pages in a configuration file. It doesn't provide a specific suggestion or point out a clear issue with the code. It violates the rule against asking the author to double-check things.
8. scripts/templates/header.html:1
- Draft comment:
The header template now includes a height attribute for the logo image, aligning with other documentation sections. This update looks good and is consistent. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
Workflow ID: wflow_ClHiWBl8CyHj02Ri
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev
in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet
mode, and more.
Co-authored-by: ellipsis-dev[bot] <65095814+ellipsis-dev[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: ellipsis-dev[bot] <65095814+ellipsis-dev[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
CI Feedback 🧐A test triggered by this PR failed. Here is an AI-generated analysis of the failure:
|
PR Type
Documentation, Enhancement
Description
Updated documentation for workflow syntax and task steps.
Added examples for subworkflow steps and map-reduce workflows.
Enhanced visual elements in markdown files with badges and logos.
Updated navigation structure in
mint.json
for advanced topics.Changes walkthrough 📝
header.html
Adjusted logo image height in header template
scripts/templates/header.html
CHANGELOG.md
Adjusted logo image height in changelog
CHANGELOG.md
IDEAS.md
Added logo and badges to IDEAS markdown
cookbooks/IDEAS.md
README.md
Enhanced README with logo and badges
cookbooks/README.md
links.
new-syntax.mdx
Updated workflow syntax and template usage
documentation/docs/advanced/new-syntax.mdx
$
prefix usage.types-of-task-steps.mdx
Added subworkflow and map-reduce examples
documentation/docs/advanced/types-of-task-steps.mdx
tasks.mdx
Updated task steps table with subworkflow
documentation/docs/concepts/tasks.mdx
mint.json
Updated navigation structure in mint.json
documentation/mint.json