Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

User Guide: Fix CSL Docs broken link #10100

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 22, 2024
Merged

Conversation

tajmone
Copy link
Contributor

@tajmone tajmone commented Aug 19, 2024

In "Specifying bibliographic data," update the URL for CSL YAML/JSON HTML-like markup: that section is no longer part of the officia
In section [Specifying bibliographic data] of the Pandoc User's Guide there's a broken link:

In BibTeX and BibLaTeX databases, pandoc parses LaTeX markup inside fields such as title; in CSL YAML databases, pandoc Markdown; and in CSL JSON databases, an HTML-like markup:

The original page/anchor no longer exists, but can still be viewed via Wayback Machine:

https://web.archive.org/web/20220205142608/https://docs.citationstyles.org/en/1.0/release-notes.html#rich-text-markup-within-fields

That section referred to a citeproc-js specific feature, its documentation has now been moved to the citeproc-js documentation:

https://citeproc-js.readthedocs.io/en/latest/csl-json/markup.html#html-like-formatting-tags

This PR fixes the old and broken link by replacing it with the working link at citeproc-js documentation.

l CSL documentation and has been moved to the citeproc-js documentation.

In "Specifying bibliographic data," update the URL for CSL YAML/JSON
HTML-like markup: that section is no longer part of the official CSL
documentation and has been moved to the citeproc-js documentation.
@jgm jgm merged commit 494716c into jgm:main Aug 22, 2024
1 of 4 checks passed
@tajmone tajmone deleted the fix-csl-html-markup-link branch August 22, 2024 21:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants