Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade tini to 0.16.1 #599

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 9, 2018
Merged

Upgrade tini to 0.16.1 #599

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 9, 2018

Conversation

damienbeaufils
Copy link

This PR upgrades Tini to the last version.

Copy link
Member

@oleg-nenashev oleg-nenashev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fine for me though it would be great to know more about the story behind this request (e.g. particular features you need)

@damienbeaufils
Copy link
Author

damienbeaufils commented Oct 25, 2017

@oleg-nenashev No particular feature, it is just to use an up-to-date dependency

@carlossg
Copy link
Contributor

we are trying to install tini from a package in #579 for alpine multiarch

@Fantoccini
Copy link

👍 for this as it enables armel arch build.

@carlossg
Copy link
Contributor

carlossg commented Jan 2, 2018

latest alpine uses 0.16.1 so I've merged the master changes for all the variants to use the same

@carlossg carlossg closed this Jan 2, 2018
@carlossg carlossg reopened this Jan 2, 2018
@Fantoccini
Copy link

Seems the only issue is the unstable key server:

https://ci.jenkins.io/blue/organizations/jenkins/Packaging%2Fdocker/activity?branch=PR-599

There are few success builds.

@carlossg carlossg merged commit f769267 into jenkinsci:master Jan 9, 2018
@dbsanfte
Copy link

Looks like something in this branch moved the executable from /bin/tini to /sbin/tini within the image. This has broken a lot of people's startup scripts I bet.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants