Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stable #26

Merged
merged 72 commits into from
Mar 11, 2024
Merged

Stable #26

merged 72 commits into from
Mar 11, 2024

Conversation

zoic21
Copy link
Contributor

@zoic21 zoic21 commented Feb 26, 2024

Description

Suggested changelog entry

Related issues/external references

Fixes #

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
    • This change is only breaking for integrators, not for external standards or end-users.
  • Documentation improvement

PR checklist

  • I have checked there is no other PR open for the same change.
  • I have read the Contribution Guidelines.
  • I grant the project the right to include and distribute the code under the GNU.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • I have verified that the code complies with the projects coding standards.
  • [Required for new sniffs] I have added MD documentation for the sniff.

@rocket13011
Copy link
Collaborator

@CodiumAI-Agent /review

@CodiumAI-Agent
Copy link

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: Code improvements and bug fixes
  • 📝 PR summary: This PR includes a variety of changes, including bug fixes, code improvements, and updates to translations. It also includes changes to the user interface and updates to the documentation. The changes are spread across multiple files, including PHP, JavaScript, and JSON files.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Bug fix
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 4, because the PR includes a large number of changes across multiple files and languages, which increases the complexity of the review.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

💡 General suggestions: The PR includes a variety of changes, including bug fixes, code improvements, and updates to translations. It would be helpful if the PR description provided more detailed information about the changes, including the specific bugs that were fixed and the areas of the code that were improved. This would make it easier for reviewers to understand the purpose of the changes and assess their impact.

🤖 Code feedback:
relevant filecore/class/z2m.class.php
suggestion      

Consider using constants for repeated strings such as 'action', 'color', etc. This can help prevent errors due to typos and make the code easier to maintain. [medium]

relevant line"+ $cmd->setType('action');"

relevant filecore/class/z2m.class.php
suggestion      

It seems like there's a lot of code duplication in the createCmd function. Consider refactoring this code to reduce duplication and improve readability. [important]

relevant line"+ $cmd->setEqLogic_id($this->getId());"

relevant filecore/class/z2m.class.php
suggestion      

The execute function seems to be quite complex with a lot of nested conditions. Consider refactoring this function to make it more readable and maintainable. [important]

relevant line"+ if(version_compare(jeedom::version(), '4.4.2') < 0){"

relevant fileplugin_info/configuration.php
suggestion      

There are several strings in the code that are not localized. Consider using a localization function to make it easier to translate the application into different languages. [medium]

relevant line"+
{{Cette configuration suppose que vous avez installé vous même zigbee2mqtt sur une machine déportée (donc pas sur jeedom). Cette configuration est assez rare si vous avez une box jeedom il faut choisir le mode local}}
"


✨ Usage guide:

Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...
Utilizing extra instructions

The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.

Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize.

Examples for extra instructions:

[pr_reviewer] # /review #
extra_instructions="""
In the code feedback section, emphasize the following:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""

Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

How to enable\disable automation
  • When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is:
pr_commands = ["/review", ...]

meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration.
Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

About the 'Code feedback' section

The review tool provides several type of feedbacks, one of them is code suggestions.
If you are interested only in the code suggestions, it is recommended to use the improve feature instead, since it dedicated only to code suggestions, and usually gives better results.
Use the review tool if you want to get a more comprehensive feedback, which includes code suggestions as well.

Auto-labels

The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR:

  • a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag)
  • a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)
Extra sub-tools

The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR.
It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case.
Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example:
require_score_review, require_soc2_review, enable_review_labels_effort, and more.

More PR-Agent commands

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

  • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
  • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
  • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
  • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
  • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
  • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
  • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
  • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details.
To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

@CodiumAI-Agent
Copy link

PR Review

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

2, because the PR includes multiple language updates and code improvements across several files. The changes are straightforward, mostly involving text corrections and enhancements for better functionality and user experience. However, it requires attention to detail to ensure that translations are accurate and that code modifications do not introduce new issues.

🧪 Relevant tests

No

🔍 Possible issues

Possible Bug: The change in the exception message in 'core/class/z2m.class.php' might affect error handling logic if not properly tested.

Code Improvement Needed: Some added conditions and logic in 'core/class/z2m.class.php' could benefit from optimization for better performance and readability.

🔒 Security concerns

No

Code feedback:
relevant filecore/class/z2m.class.php
suggestion      

Consider optimizing the new conditionals and logic added for handling dependencies and daemon start processes. Refactoring for clarity and efficiency could improve maintainability. [important]

relevant linepublic static function dependancy_end() {

relevant filecore/class/z2m.class.php
suggestion      

Ensure thorough testing of the new exception message change to confirm that it does not affect the existing error handling and user feedback mechanisms negatively. [important]

relevant linethrow new Exception(__("Plugin Mqtt Manager (mqtt2) non installé, dépendance en cours pour corriger. Veuillez refaire la configuration dans quelques minutes", __FILE__));

relevant filecore/ajax/z2m.ajax.php
suggestion      

Verify that the inclusion mode toggle (enable/disable) functions correctly across all scenarios, including edge cases where rapid toggling might occur. Adding debounce logic or state verification before toggling could prevent potential issues. [medium]

relevant line'value' => (init('mode') == 1),

relevant fileplugin_info/configuration.php
suggestion      

For the newly added option '/dev/ttyAMA0', ensure that it's universally applicable or conditionally displayed based on the system's hardware capabilities to avoid confusion for users on incompatible systems. [medium]

relevant lineif(file_exists('/dev/ttyAMA0')){


✨ Review tool usage guide:

Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...
Utilizing extra instructions

The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.

Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize.

Examples for extra instructions:

[pr_reviewer] # /review #
extra_instructions="""
In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""

Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

How to enable\disable automation
  • When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is:
pr_commands = ["/review", ...]

meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration.
Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

Auto-labels

The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR:

  • a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag)
  • a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)
Extra sub-tools

The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR.
It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case.
Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example:
require_score_review, require_soc2_ticket, and more.

Auto-approve PRs

By invoking:

/review auto_approve

The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval.

To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following:

[pr_reviewer]
enable_auto_approval = true

(this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository)

You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the estimated_review_effort is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag:

[pr_reviewer]
maximal_review_effort = 5
More PR-Agent commands

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

  • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
  • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
  • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
  • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
  • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
  • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
  • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
  • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details.
To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

@zoic21 zoic21 merged commit 682f72c into master Mar 11, 2024
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants