-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 282
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Migrate to GitHub Actions. #246
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #246 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 80.10% 80.10%
=======================================
Files 27 27
Lines 1659 1659
Branches 191 191
=======================================
Hits 1329 1329
Misses 227 227
Partials 103 103 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was unaware of the Travis plan changes. Thanks for sharing the details behind this.
Can we also push the packages to GH releases? (kinda like this)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
Woops, I missed this comment, let me check how this could work in combination with the PyPA GitHub action we're using to publish the release to the Jazzband package index. I'll open a ticket. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM :)
Travis CI has a new pricing model which places limits on open source.
Many projects are moving to GitHub Actions instead, including Jazzband projects:
This is based on jazzband/contextlib2#26.
No more mention of Travis CI in the codebase:
$ git grep -i travis $
TODO:
JAZZBAND_RELEASE_KEY
to the repo secrets.