docs(changelog): Release 0.3.0

CHANGELOG.md

@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+<a name="0.0.3"></a>
+## [0.0.3](https://github.com/jantimon/iconfont-webpack-plugin/compare/v0.0.2...v0.0.3) (2016-09-14)
+
+
+### Bug Fixes
+
+* **postcss-plugin:** Fix dependency watching ([ccbf05e](https://github.com/jantimon/iconfont-webpack-plugin/commit/ccbf05e))
+
+
 <a name="0.0.2"></a>
 ## [0.0.2](https://github.com/jantimon/iconfont-webpack-plugin/compare/v0.0.1...v0.0.2) (2016-09-13)
 

README.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ This release is rather for feedback purpose than for production usage.
 
 # Icon Font Webpack Plugin
 
-This plugin tries to keep the usage and maintainance of icon fonts as simple as possible.
+This plugin tries to keep the usage and maintenance of icon fonts as simple as possible.  
 
 ## Installation
 
@@ -15,8 +15,6 @@ npm i --save-dev iconfont-webpack-plugin
 ## Configuration
 
 ```js
-var path = require('path');
-
 var IconfontWebpackPlugin = require('iconfont-webpack-plugin');
 
   // make sure you use the postcss loader:
@@ -32,13 +30,12 @@ var IconfontWebpackPlugin = require('iconfont-webpack-plugin');
   plugins: [
     new IconfontWebpackPlugin()
   ]
-
 ```
 
 ## Usage
 
-If you set this plugin up properly you can finely use a `font-icon` declarations
-in your `css/scss/sass/less/...`:
+After setting up the plugin your css has now a new feature:  
+`font-icon` declarations
 
 ```css
 a:before {
@@ -70,25 +67,27 @@ a:hover:before {
 }
 ```
 
-## Why shouldn't I just use SVGs instead?
+## Should you use icon fonts for everything?
 
-SVGs have some disadvantages and lack certain features especially when using inside pseudo elements.
+No.
 
-* [CSS-Transform issues in older Internet Explorer versions](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21298338/css-transform-on-svg-elements-ie9)
-* [IE9 - IE 10 scaling issues](https://gist.github.com/larrybotha/7881691)
-* Fill color doesn't work on background SVG images
-* Inline SVGs are resolved relative to the page not to the css
+Icon fonts are really good for decorative icons (where the icon is purely ornamental and doesn’t incorporate core meaning or functionality).
 
-## Should I use icon fonts for everything?
+For critical icons without fallbacks (like a hamburger menu icon) you should rather use SVGs.
+But also JPEGs, PNGs and even GIFs have their use cases.
 
-No. 
+Pick the best solution for your problem - there is no silver bullet.
+With this plugin it is pretty easy to use pixel images, svgs and font-icons side by side.
 
-Icon fonts are really good for decorative icons (where the icon is purely ornamental and doesn’t incorporate core meaning or functionality). 
+## When should you use icon fonts over pure SVGs?
 
-For critical icons without fallbacks (like a hamburger menu icon) you should rather use SVGs.
-But also JPEGs, PNGs or even GIFs have their use cases.
+Icon fonts are dead - long live font icons.  
+SVGs have some disadvantages and lack certain features especially when used inside pseudo elements:
 
-Pick the best solution for your problem - there is no silver bullet.
+* [CSS-Transform issues in older Internet Explorer versions](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21298338/css-transform-on-svg-elements-ie9)
+* [IE9 - IE 11 scaling issues](https://gist.github.com/larrybotha/7881691)
+* Fill color doesn't work for background SVG images
+* Inline SVGs are resolved relative to the page not to the css
 
 # License
 

package.json

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "name": "iconfont-webpack-plugin",
-  "version": "0.0.2",
-  "description": "Simple icon font handling using webpack",
+  "version": "0.0.3",
+  "description": "Simple icon font handling for webpack",
   "main": "index.js",
   "files": [
     "index.js",
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
     "ignore": []
   },
   "devDependencies": {
+    "conventional-changelog-cli": "^1.2.0",
     "css-loader": "^0.23.1",
     "cz-conventional-changelog": "^1.2.0",
     "extract-text-webpack-plugin": "^1.0.1",