-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use RegExp in where without having to use the RegExp comparator #13
Labels
Comments
jamesfer
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 8, 2018
Javascript RegExp objects can now be passed into the regexp comparator and used directly as a value in Where clauses. Closes #13
jamesfer
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 6, 2019
Javascript RegExp objects can now be passed into the regexp comparator and used directly as a value in Where clauses. Closes #13
jamesfer
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 6, 2019
Javascript RegExp objects can now be passed into the regexp comparator and used directly as a value in Where clauses. Closes #13
jamesfer
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 6, 2019
# [4.2.0](v4.1.0...v4.2.0) (2019-08-06) ### Features * **Where:** allow RegExp objects directly in where clause ([595b6a9](595b6a9)), closes [#13](#13) [skip ci]
🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 4.2.0 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
When a regular expression is used as the value in a where clause, it should be implied to use the RegExp operator,
=~
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: