-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 96
Create 2018-08-20--js-core-dev-team-weekly.md #682
Conversation
The discussion in irc #ipfs-dev makes it appear that it was indeed an issue with the js and go meetings clashing. fyi @diasdavid |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
My bad! ❤️ |
Interesting. I definitely created two different meetings, but perhaps given the fact that they are both associated with my account makes it that Zoom assumes I can't be in both at the same time. This is a good reminder to stay on time :) |
|
||
@vmx | ||
- Done: | ||
- (already last week): Describe your DAG in a text file: https://github.com/vmx/dagbuilder |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the goal of this module?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Check the Q&A below :)
@vmx | ||
- Done: | ||
- (already last week): Describe your DAG in a text file: https://github.com/vmx/dagbuilder | ||
- Hello world libp2p (for GraphSync) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It works? Is there a demo?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's just a libp2p hello world to get me familiar with the code. So it would be the same as checking out the libp2p examples.
- delegate peer routing test updates are ready to merge https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p-delegated-peer-routing/pull/3 | ||
- Found an inconsistency issue when adding libp2p tests for delegate content routing. Fixed that, going to finish the libp2p tests for that today. | ||
- Blocked: | ||
- Go delegate route endpoints https://github.com/ipfs/go-ipfs/pull/4595. We can get the work finished for delegated peer/content routing, but it won't be functional until this is deployed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jacobheun can you open an issue on ipfs/infrastructure to track this ask?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done, ipfs/infra#426, with links off to the blocking go-ipfs issue and js-libp2p core issue.
- Found an inconsistency issue when adding libp2p tests for delegate content routing. Fixed that, going to finish the libp2p tests for that today. | ||
- Blocked: | ||
- Go delegate route endpoints https://github.com/ipfs/go-ipfs/pull/4595. We can get the work finished for delegated peer/content routing, but it won't be functional until this is deployed. | ||
- [ipfs-api#837](https://github.com/ipfs/js-ipfs-api/pull/837) will prevent me from finalizing my PR for libp2p content/delegate routing tests. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems that @alanshaw handled this one for you :)
Note the meeting ended abruptly due to another meeting starting that had the same host or id. Possibly the go weekly?