Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gx: update go-ipfs-files #5985

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 11, 2019
Merged

gx: update go-ipfs-files #5985

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 11, 2019

Conversation

Stebalien
Copy link
Member

fix compatibility issue with js-ipfs

@Stebalien Stebalien requested a review from Kubuxu as a code owner February 11, 2019 16:47
@ghost ghost assigned Stebalien Feb 11, 2019
@ghost ghost added the status/in-progress In progress label Feb 11, 2019
@magik6k magik6k self-requested a review February 11, 2019 16:54
@Stebalien
Copy link
Member Author

The interop tests now pass but there's something wrong with sharding (calculating the wrong hash...).

@Stebalien
Copy link
Member Author

Fix in: ipfs/go-ipfs-files#7

fix compatibility issue with js-ipfs

License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Steven Allen <[email protected]>
@Stebalien Stebalien force-pushed the gx/update-go-ipfs-files branch from 9027fc5 to e97a60b Compare February 11, 2019 18:49
@Stebalien
Copy link
Member Author

(merging as this is a gx-only patch)

@Stebalien Stebalien merged commit f749d58 into master Feb 11, 2019
@ghost ghost removed the status/in-progress In progress label Feb 11, 2019
Copy link
Member

@Kubuxu Kubuxu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Late 👍

hacdias pushed a commit to ipfs/boxo that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2023
gx: update go-ipfs-files

This commit was moved from ipfs/kubo@f749d58
@hacdias hacdias deleted the gx/update-go-ipfs-files branch May 9, 2023 10:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants