Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"ipfs mount" does not work from Dockerfile image #4329

Closed
davidcittadini opened this issue Oct 20, 2017 · 0 comments · Fixed by #5560
Closed

"ipfs mount" does not work from Dockerfile image #4329

davidcittadini opened this issue Oct 20, 2017 · 0 comments · Fixed by #5560
Assignees
Labels
kind/bug A bug in existing code (including security flaws) topic/fuse Topic fuse

Comments

@davidcittadini
Copy link

Version information:

go-ipfs version: 0.4.11-20eabf8
Repo version: 6
System version: amd64/linux
Golang version: go1.9

Type:

Bug

Severity:

High

Description:

If simply pull and run the Docker image and then exec into the container, performing an ipfs mount causes the following:

Error: fusermount: exec: "fusermount": executable file not found in $PATH

Therefore, I assume that the default Dockerfile is not including all the tools to fully support ipfs mounting.

@whyrusleeping whyrusleeping added the status/ready Ready to be worked label Oct 22, 2017
@Stebalien Stebalien added kind/bug A bug in existing code (including security flaws) topic/containers + vms topic/fuse Topic fuse and removed topic/containers + vms labels Jul 13, 2018
@hannahhoward hannahhoward added status/in-progress In progress and removed status/ready Ready to be worked labels Oct 2, 2018
hannahhoward added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 4, 2018
fixes #4329

License: MIT
Signed-off-by: hannahhoward <[email protected]>
@ghost ghost assigned hannahhoward Oct 4, 2018
hannahhoward added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 4, 2018
fixes #4329

License: MIT
Signed-off-by: hannahhoward <[email protected]>
Stebalien pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 9, 2019
@ghost ghost removed the status/in-progress In progress label May 9, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/bug A bug in existing code (including security flaws) topic/fuse Topic fuse
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants