This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 1, 2023. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we want to simplify and have go-ipfs and js-ipfs green, instead of this repo, then maybe:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Assuming no disastrous problems with the js monorepo I think making CI pass seems like the reasonable thing to do here and if it's as simple as changing a line from
v0.X.Y
->abcd1234
then it's pretty simple as well.In the go-ipfs v0.11.0 release alone there are 3 breaking changes that it's helpful to see fail and then fix individually (sharding, circuit-relay, pubsub). If we don't keep CI green here it puts a lot of pressure on reviewers to make sure when things work on their machines that it's not just on their machines due to some particular configuration or stray environment variable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ack. After thinking about it in context of go-ipfs 0.11 using
interop/master
in go-ipfs (rolling branch, instead of hardcoded revision) will make our merge fest easier.