chore: update all dependencies

[victorb]

License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Victor Bjelkholm [email protected]

[victorb]

This works! Managed to release aegir-test-repo with these changes, and aegir spawns even faster now (and webpack builds seems faster, but I have not measured to YMMV)

@diasdavid @dignifiedquire can I have some reviews?

[vmx]

I don't know what the observable polyfill is needed for, but the rest looks good. Though I'd like to have a look from someone second :)

[daviddias]

Pinging @hugomrdias to share some of his Webpack 4 wisdom here.

[hugomrdias]

looks good!

[daviddias]

@victorbjelkholm before merging, you might want to give it a spin on js-ipfs and its examples. Just to triple check that the bundle is sound.

[victorb]

I don't know what the observable polyfill is needed for, but the rest looks good. Though I'd like to have a look from someone second :)

Pulled in and required because listr requires observables to exists before loading the module, new change in the module, hence added in this commit.

before merging, you might want to give it a spin on js-ipfs and its examples. Just to triple check that the bundle is sound.

Good point, will do! Thanks

[jacobheun]

I am using this branch against the js-ipfs node 10 fixes, ipfs/js-ipfs#1358. The jenkins builds look good in node 8, 9 and 10.

This branch looks good from my end. Can we get it merged and released?

[victorb]

Will do! I just need to test js-ipfs + examples, then I'll merge if everything looks good.

[achingbrain]

Can you merge #231 first? This PR has a few dep version changes that violate our dep policy - #231 will flag those up during the linting step.

[vmx]

@victorbjelkholm Can you rebase this one? There's lots of "npm audit" noise due to AEgir, I'd really love to see this merged.

[victorb]

Will submit new PR as this is outdated by now...