Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RFC: Adding marc tags to field descriptions #35

Open
aw-bib opened this issue Oct 9, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

RFC: Adding marc tags to field descriptions #35

aw-bib opened this issue Oct 9, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@aw-bib
Copy link

aw-bib commented Oct 9, 2015

Currently, the schema for Marc21 contain the "human readable marc tag". E.g. ""title_statement" gives

"description": "Title Statement"

It would be helpful if we could also hold the numeric tag, ie. 245.

  • This serves as sort of a unique identifier
  • It helps inline documentation
  • It is easy to construct a lookup url form that (e.g. http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd245.html), that can serve well in a help functionality.
  • It might serve in some upcoming editor for a "non-human" format (being usually preferred by full time cataloguers due to it's compactness).

Without changing the model one could just add that to "description". Similarly, it might be very helpul to have the subfield codes in some sort of description as well (due to their uniqueness). E.g.

"title_statement": {
        "description": "Title Statement",
        "tag": "245",
        "title": {
             "type": "string",
             "subfield" : "a"
        },
@fjorba
Copy link
Member

fjorba commented Oct 9, 2015

Yes, please! I wholeheartedly agree whole with @aw-bib.

@jirikuncar jirikuncar added this to the someday milestone Jan 28, 2016
jirikuncar pushed a commit to jirikuncar/dojson that referenced this issue Jul 8, 2016
* Adds marc21 tags to schemas. (closes inveniosoftware#35)

Signed-off-by: Sami Hiltunen <[email protected]>
@aw-bib
Copy link
Author

aw-bib commented Mar 23, 2017

BTW: this tag would be a very useful alternative field name for the upcoming json editor.

@aw-bib
Copy link
Author

aw-bib commented Mar 23, 2017

ping @tiborsimko / @jmartinm IUGW2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants