Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added handling for verify_ssl #28

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 10, 2022
Merged

Added handling for verify_ssl #28

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 10, 2022

Conversation

msmall318
Copy link
Contributor

@msmall318 msmall318 commented Sep 10, 2022

The current blackbricks doesn't handle the databricks cli insecure argument. This pull request enables handling. See discussion at the community forum. This change incorporates the solution Megan05 mentioned in same thread.
Capture

@bsamseth
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for adding this! I slightly modified your initial commit to account for the slightly odd way the databricks CLI handles the insecure option. They treat any value as the option being enabled, even if you set it to false. Even though that might be a little unintuitive, blackbricks should give it the same treatment.

I just figured I would add a link to a possible solution to the SSL issues I'm guessing you are facing. Just in case it helps: https://stackoverflow.com/a/73650193/3377926

@bsamseth bsamseth merged commit c82bef8 into inspera:master Sep 10, 2022
@msmall318
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks! I'll look into that option, too.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants