adding check and fixing indexing error

[Melkiades]

Fixes #90

[github-actions]

Code Coverage Summary

Filename             Stmts    Miss  Cover    Missing
-----------------  -------  ------  -------  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R/format_value.R       195      15  92.31%   72, 156, 175, 246, 359-366, 375, 386, 394
R/generics.R            82      20  75.61%   161-167, 180, 190, 243-248, 297-308, 381, 393, 426, 455, 467
R/labels.R              55       7  87.27%   53, 59, 68, 109, 137, 146, 150
R/matrix_form.R        174      34  80.46%   52-55, 185-200, 287, 309-314, 354-359, 381-391, 428
R/mpf_exporters.R      133     133  0.00%    3-221
R/page_size.R           43       8  81.40%   31-34, 64-70
R/pagination.R         184      44  76.09%   185, 199-208, 211-214, 221-240, 248-257, 287, 343-344, 346, 391
R/tostring.R           354      56  84.18%   7-12, 12-13, 13-14, 14-15, 15-16, 16-17, 17-18, 18-20, 20-22, 161-163, 205-206, 345-346, 430, 445, 552-566, 606, 642, 679-682, 686, 694, 735, 742
R/utils.R                1       0  100.00%
TOTAL                 1221     317  74.04%

Diff against main

Filename        Stmts    Miss  Cover
------------  -------  ------  -------
R/tostring.R      +15      +1  +0.40%
TOTAL             +15      +1  +0.24%

Results for commit: 5c5f382

Minimum allowed coverage is 80%

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results

[gmbecker]

@cicdguy we are still getting the (quite disruptive) false positives fromt he SuperLinter for the formatters package.

[cicdguy]

@cicdguy we are still getting the (quite disruptive) false positives fromt he SuperLinter for the formatters package.

I believe cb2041e has resolved it. Are you talking about the annotations? If so, I can disable those also.

[Melkiades]

@cicdguy we are still getting the (quite disruptive) false positives fromt he SuperLinter for the formatters package.

I believe cb2041e has resolved it. Are you talking about the annotations? If so, I can disable those also.

I think Gabe was referring to the error there was before. Thank you for fixing it ;)

[gmbecker]

@cicdguy we are still getting the (quite disruptive) false positives fromt he SuperLinter for the formatters package.

I believe cb2041e has resolved it. Are you talking about the annotations? If so, I can disable those also.

@cicdguy Yes please do, they're very disruptive and completely useless when trying to read the changes in the face of the mass of false positives

[Melkiades]

I do not understand if this is good to be added here... I do not know if this is followed by an actual indentation somewhere before. Afterwards, it is for sure reconstructed as such

[Melkiades]

Still it works well now, and for the reindentation I use mat$indent_size so I think it makes sense to have it in the object creation here

[shajoezhu]

lgtm! Thanks a lot @Melkiades ! tested downstream in Chevron, it is now working.

[shajoezhu]

Hi @gmbecker , hope you are well. Can you accept the changes here. The problem is now resolved. and we have several PRs downstream in Chevron is blocked by this. Thanks a lot!