Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[skip vbump] release 0.2.9 #813

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 17, 2025
Merged

[skip vbump] release 0.2.9 #813

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 17, 2025

Conversation

BFalquet
Copy link
Contributor

@BFalquet BFalquet commented Feb 5, 2025

[skip vbump] release v0.2.9

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Unit Tests Summary

  1 files   58 suites   3m 12s ⏱️
293 tests 291 ✅ 1 💤 0 ❌ 1 🔥
686 runs  676 ✅ 9 💤 0 ❌ 1 🔥

For more details on these errors, see this check.

Results for commit cbf12c1.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Unit Test Performance Difference

Test Suite $Status$ Time on main $±Time$ $±Tests$ $±Skipped$ $±Failures$ $±Errors$
aet04 💚 $11.30$ $-7.12$ $-8$ $+2$ $0$ $0$
chevron_tlg-methods 💚 $9.76$ $-1.99$ $-5$ $+14$ $0$ $0$
coxt01 💚 $1.67$ $-1.15$ $-6$ $+1$ $0$ $0$
coxt02 💚 $2.19$ $-1.54$ $-6$ $+1$ $0$ $0$
lbt14 💚 $8.10$ $-1.02$ $-4$ $+10$ $0$ $0$
rspt01 💚 $7.59$ $-3.60$ $-12$ $+7$ $0$ $0$
ttet01 💚 $5.74$ $-2.38$ $-6$ $+4$ $0$ $0$
utils 💚 $2.34$ $-2.18$ $-61$ $+1$ $0$ $0$
Additional test case details
Test Suite $Status$ Time on main $±Time$ Test Case
aet04 💚 $2.06$ $-1.25$ aet04_can_handle_NA_values
aet04 💚 $9.24$ $-5.88$ aet04_can_handle_some_NA_values
coxt01 💚 $1.66$ $-1.16$ coxt01_can_handle_some_NA_values
coxt02 💚 $2.18$ $-1.55$ coxt02_can_handle_some_NA_values
utils 💀 $0.01$ $-0.01$ convert_to_month_warning_messages_as_expected
utils 💀 $0.02$ $-0.02$ convert_to_month_work_as_expected
utils 💀 $0.01$ $-0.01$ do_call_errors_as_expected
utils 💀 $0.01$ $-0.01$ do_call_work_as_expected
utils 💀 $0.01$ $-0.01$ droplevels.character_works_as_expected
utils 💀 $0.03$ $-0.03$ execute_with_args_works_as_expected
utils 💀 $0.01$ $-0.01$ expand_list_works
utils 💀 $0.01$ $-0.01$ format_date_works_as_expected_for_Date
utils 💀 $0.01$ $-0.01$ format_date_works_as_expected_for_POSIXct
utils 💀 $0.01$ $-0.01$ get_section_div_works
utils 💀 $0.88$ $-0.88$ gg_list_is_deprecated
utils 💀 $0.02$ $-0.02$ gg_theme_chevron_works_as_expected
utils 💀 $0.91$ $-0.91$ grob_list_is_deprecated
utils 💀 $0.01$ $-0.01$ lvls.character_works_as_expected
utils 💀 $0.01$ $-0.01$ lvls.default_works_as_expected
utils 💀 $0.01$ $-0.01$ lvls.factor_works_as_expected
utils 💀 $0.01$ $-0.01$ modify_character_works
utils 💀 $0.01$ $-0.01$ modify_default_args_works_as_expected
utils 💀 $0.02$ $-0.02$ quote_str_works_as_expected
utils 💀 $0.02$ $-0.02$ set_section_div_works

Results for commit 4dced81

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@BFalquet BFalquet marked this pull request as draft February 5, 2025 10:40
@BFalquet BFalquet requested a review from shajoezhu February 6, 2025 08:37
@shajoezhu shajoezhu mentioned this pull request Feb 14, 2025
@BFalquet BFalquet marked this pull request as ready for review February 17, 2025 08:36
Copy link
Contributor

@shajoezhu shajoezhu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm! thanks @BFalquet

@BFalquet BFalquet merged commit 38021e0 into main Feb 17, 2025
68 of 70 checks passed
@BFalquet BFalquet deleted the 812-release-0-2-9@main branch February 17, 2025 13:37
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 17, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants