Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: local setup relayer validating grpc url #156

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 10, 2025
Merged

Conversation

Benzbeeb
Copy link
Collaborator

@Benzbeeb Benzbeeb commented Mar 10, 2025

Description

Closes: #XXXX


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow-up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Improved address validation to require a valid port in connection endpoints, enhancing robustness.
  • Tests
    • Expanded the testing of URL validations to cover scenarios with missing or invalid ports, ensuring better error detection.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 10, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a new test function, TestValidateURLWithPort, in common/validate_test.go to assert various URL scenarios with ports. Additionally, the validation logic in the GRPC address configuration has been updated in models/relayer/init.go by replacing common.ValidateURL with common.ValidateURLWithPort. Both changes aim to ensure that URL validations explicitly check for port information.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
common/validate_test.go Added TestValidateURLWithPort with test cases covering valid URLs with ports, missing ports, and invalid port scenarios using require assertions.
models/relayer/init.go Updated defaultL2ConfigLocal by changing the ValidateFn for l2.grpc_address from common.ValidateURL to common.ValidateURLWithPort for accuracy.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant T as TestValidateURLWithPort
    participant V as ValidateURLWithPort
    participant A as require/assert

    T->>V: Invoke validation with test URL
    V-->>T: Return validation result (error or success)
    T->>A: Assert expected outcome
Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant CL as ConfigLoader
    participant C as defaultL2ConfigLocal
    participant V as ValidateURLWithPort

    CL->>C: Load l2.grpc_address configuration
    C->>V: Validate GRPC address URL with port
    V-->>C: Return validation outcome
    CL->>C: Proceed based on validation result
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • WasinWatt
  • traviolus

Poem

I'm a little rabbit coding through the night,
Testing ports to ensure all URLs are just right.
Hopping through code with a joyful leap,
Validations secure so nothing's left to weep.
With carrots and code, I cheer with delight! 🥕🐰


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Lite

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9235f38 and 499d746.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • common/validate_test.go (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
common/validate_test.go (2)

6-7: Good addition of require package.

Using the require package from testify provides better assertion functions with clearer error messages compared to standard testing conditionals.


168-224: Well-structured test function with comprehensive test cases.

The new TestValidateURLWithPort function uses table-driven tests which is a Go best practice. The test cases cover a good range of scenarios including:

  • Valid HTTP/HTTPS URLs with ports
  • URLs missing ports
  • URLs with invalid port numbers (too high or zero)
  • URLs with invalid protocol

This implementation aligns well with the PR objective to fix GRPC URL validation in the local setup.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
common/validate_test.go (1)

168-218: Well-structured test for ValidateURLWithPort function.

This test comprehensively covers the essential validation cases:

  • Valid URLs with ports
  • URLs missing ports
  • URLs with invalid port values (too high or zero)

The use of require package is good as it provides clearer error messages and stops on first failure.

For consistency with other tests in this file, consider gradually migrating the older test functions to use the require package instead of manual error checks with t.Errorf.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5827528 and 9235f38.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • common/validate_test.go (2 hunks)
  • models/relayer/init.go (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Run Integration Tests on Ubuntu
🔇 Additional comments (2)
models/relayer/init.go (1)

37-37: Good change ensuring gRPC URL always has a port.

The update from ValidateURL to ValidateURLWithPort ensures that gRPC addresses will always include a port number, which is required for proper gRPC communication. This change makes the validation consistent with defaultL2ConfigManual which already uses ValidateURLWithPort on line 44.

common/validate_test.go (1)

6-7: Added import properly positioned with a blank line.

Good practice to group imports with blank lines.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Mar 10, 2025
@WasinWatt WasinWatt merged commit f9dd081 into main Mar 10, 2025
5 checks passed
@WasinWatt WasinWatt deleted the fix/local-setup-relayer branch March 10, 2025 08:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants