feat: add ordering at ica account creation #276
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce enhancements to the Inter-Blockchain Communication (IBC) functionality within the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Dependency Review✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.OpenSSF Scorecard
Scanned Manifest Files |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
x/intertx/client/cli/flags.go (1)
26-26: LGTM with suggestion: Flag initialization for ordered option.The initialization of the
FlagOrderedflag is correct and consistent with other flags. The default value and description are appropriate.However, consider adding a comment or documentation explaining the implications of setting this flag to true. This would help users understand when and why they might want to use ordered channels.
x/intertx/client/cli/tx.go (1)
60-63: LGTM: Implementation of ordered transactionsThe implementation of the
orderedflag and setting ofmsg.Orderingis correct and aligns with the PR objective. It properly allows for optional ordering of transactions during ICA account creation.A minor suggestion for improved clarity:
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this new feature:
ordered := viper.GetBool(FlagOrdered) +// Set the transaction ordering to ORDERED if the flag is set if ordered { msg.Ordering = channeltypes.ORDERED }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
x/intertx/types/tx.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.go
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- proto/initia/intertx/v1/tx.proto (2 hunks)
- x/intertx/client/cli/flags.go (1 hunks)
- x/intertx/client/cli/tx.go (3 hunks)
- x/intertx/keeper/msg_server.go (1 hunks)
- x/intertx/keeper/msg_server_test.go (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
x/intertx/client/cli/flags.go (3)
12-13: LGTM: New constant for ordered flag.The new constant
FlagOrderedis well-defined and follows the existing naming convention. The comment accurately describes its purpose.
20-20: LGTM: New flag set for ordered option.The new flag set
fsOrderedis correctly implemented and consistent with existing flag sets. The use offlag.ContinueOnErroris appropriate for CLI applications.
Line range hint
1-26: Verify completeness of feature implementation.The changes in this file successfully add a CLI option for ordered channels, which aligns with the PR objective of adding ordering at ICA account creation. However, to ensure the feature is fully implemented:
- Verify that the
orderedflag is properly handled in the command execution logic.- Check if there are other files that need to be modified to support this feature (e.g., business logic handling the ordered channel creation).
- Ensure that appropriate tests have been added or updated to cover this new functionality.
To help verify the implementation, you can run the following script:
proto/initia/intertx/v1/tx.proto (1)
9-9: LGTM: New import statement for IBC channel proto.The addition of
import "ibc/core/channel/v1/channel.proto";is correct and necessary for using theibc.core.channel.v1.Ordertype in theMsgRegisterAccountmessage.x/intertx/keeper/msg_server.go (1)
38-39: LGTM! Consider additional validations and documentation updates.The addition of the
Orderingfield to theicaMsgobject aligns with the PR objective of adding ordering at ICA account creation. This change enhances the flexibility of the interchain account registration process.However, please consider the following suggestions:
- Verify that this change is consistent with the expectations of the ICA module and doesn't introduce any unexpected behavior.
- Consider adding validation for the
Orderingfield to ensure it contains a valid value before passing it to the ICA controller.- Update relevant documentation to reflect this new capability, including any API documentation or user guides.
- Ensure that appropriate unit and integration tests are added or updated to cover this new functionality.
To verify the consistency with the ICA module and check for any related changes, please run the following script:
x/intertx/client/cli/tx.go (3)
19-19: LGTM: New import for channeltypesThe addition of the
channeltypesimport is appropriate for the new functionality being introduced. It's correctly imported from the IBC module.
Line range hint
1-132: Overall assessment: Changes look good with minor suggestionsThe implementation of the ordering feature for ICA account creation is well-integrated and aligns with the PR objectives. The changes are logically sound and follow good coding practices. A few minor suggestions have been made for improved clarity and documentation.
To finalize the review:
- Consider adding the suggested comment for clarity in the
getRegisterAccountCmdfunction.- Please provide information about the
fsOrderedflag definition as requested.- Ensure that appropriate tests have been added or updated to cover the new functionality, as mentioned in the PR checklist.
- Update any relevant documentation to reflect this new feature.
Once these points are addressed, the changes will be ready for approval.
75-75: LGTM: Addition of fsOrdered flagThe addition of the
fsOrderedflag to the command is correct and necessary for the new ordering functionality.Could you please provide information about where
fsOrderedis defined and what type of flag it is? This will help ensure it's properly implemented.To verify the flag definition, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Could not locate the definition of
fsOrderedusing the previous script. To ensure a thorough search, please run the following script:
LGTM: Definition and Usage of
fsOrderedFlag ConfirmedThe
fsOrderedflag is properly defined inx/intertx/client/cli/flags.goand correctly added to the command inx/intertx/client/cli/tx.gofor the new ordering functionality.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition of fsOrdered rg --type go 'var\s+fsOrdered' x/intertxLength of output: 42
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all occurrences of fsOrdered in Go files within x/intertx rg --type go 'fsOrdered' x/intertxLength of output: 298
x/intertx/keeper/msg_server_test.go (1)
80-80: LGTM. Consider expanding test coverage for ordering types.The addition of
msg.Ordering = channeltypes.ORDEREDaligns well with the PR objective of adding ordering at ICA account creation. This change ensures that the test covers the new feature of specifying ordering during account registration.Consider the following suggestions to enhance test coverage:
- Add test cases for different ordering types (e.g., UNORDERED) to ensure the system handles various scenarios correctly.
- Verify if any existing assertions need to be updated to check the ordering type after account registration.
Please confirm that this change doesn't affect other parts of the test suite. Run the following command to check for any other occurrences of
Orderingin the test files:✅ Verification successful
LGTM. Consider expanding test coverage for different ordering types.
The addition of
msg.Ordering = channeltypes.ORDEREDaligns well with the PR objective of adding ordering at ICA account creation. To ensure comprehensive test coverage:
- Add test cases for
channeltypes.UNORDEREDto verify that the system handles unordered scenarios correctly.- Review existing assertions to confirm they account for both
ORDEREDandUNORDEREDordering types.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
rg --type go 'Ordering' x/intertx/Length of output: 1085
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #276 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 40.64% 40.64% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 265 265
Lines 25246 25254 +8
==========================================
+ Hits 10262 10265 +3
- Misses 13396 13401 +5
Partials 1588 1588
|
Description
Closes: #XXXX
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...