fix: audit

[beer-1]

Description

Closes: #XXXX

---

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

• included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
• confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• targeted the correct branch
• provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
• reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
• included the necessary unit and integration tests
• updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
• confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

• confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
• confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
• reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance the logic and clarity of the token allocation and fee calculation functions across multiple files. Key updates include renaming methods to better reflect their functionality, implementing checks to ensure data validity, and improving internal calculations. These modifications collectively aim to boost code robustness and readability, ensuring that the system behaves predictably in various scenarios.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
x/distribution/keeper/allocation.go	Improved checking when retrieving poolSize, enhancing robustness against uninitialized access.
x/move/ante/fee.go, x/move/ante/fee_test.go, x/move/keeper/dex.go, x/move/keeper/dex_test.go, x/move/types/connector.go, x/move/types/connector_test.go, x/move/types/exported.go	Renamed GetQuoteSpotPrice to GetBaseSpotPrice across multiple files to clarify functionality; adjusted calculations accordingly.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant A as User
    participant B as MempoolFeeChecker
    participant C as DexKeeper

    A->>B: Initiate transaction with fees
    B->>B: Check Tx Fee with Min Gas Prices
    B->>C: Fetch Base Spot Price
    C-->>B: Return Base Spot Price
    B-->>A: Confirm transaction with fee calculation

Loading

Poem

🐰 In the meadow where tokens play,
A change has come, brightening the day.
With fees aligned and prices fair,
The rabbits hop with joyful flair!
So let us dance, let us cheer,
For clarity brought us closer here! 🌼

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

OpenSSF Scorecard

Package	Version	Score	Details

Scanned Manifest Files

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 86.66667% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 40.61%. Comparing base (95af85d) to head (dccf86a).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
x/distribution/keeper/allocation.go	50.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
x/move/ante/fee.go	90.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #253   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   40.61%   40.61%           
=======================================
  Files         264      264           
  Lines       25081    25082    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits        10186    10187    +1     
  Misses      13326    13326           
  Partials     1569     1569           

Files	Coverage Δ
x/move/keeper/dex.go	46.44% <100.00%> (ø)
x/move/types/connector.go	21.63% <100.00%> (ø)
x/distribution/keeper/allocation.go	67.61% <50.00%> (ø)
x/move/ante/fee.go	75.00% <90.00%> (+0.31%)	⬆️