Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add crypto provider #1214
Add crypto provider #1214
Changes from 11 commits
9b9261b
8d4f615
d15583d
0b44449
72133d3
88e9ff3
a325f63
100fc53
8048e4d
63a2d0e
bcec883
3cce56f
0cafbb9
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Having this one optional depends on whether
CryptoProvider
will be under a feature flag.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As I understand it now, we lock the signature type in
CryptoProvider
to the one defined byk256
. If we cannot abstract this associated type to less specific rust-crypto bounds ("must be fixed array of 256 bits"?) and still keep it usable in generic code, thenk256
should become a hard dependency. But I thought dependency management was the whole purpose of this rework.