Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Update dependabot labels #14807

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2024

Conversation

powersj
Copy link
Contributor

@powersj powersj commented Feb 13, 2024

Summary

This will force the use of only "dependencies" as the only label dependabot adds to PRs.

Checklist

  • No AI generated code was used in this PR

This will force the use of only "dependencies" as the only label
dependabot adds to PRs.
@telegraf-tiger telegraf-tiger bot added the chore label Feb 13, 2024
@DStrand1 DStrand1 added the ready for final review This pull request has been reviewed and/or tested by multiple users and is ready for a final review. label Feb 13, 2024
Copy link
Member

@srebhan srebhan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@powersj, shouldn't PRs by dependabot also be labeled chore?

@powersj
Copy link
Contributor Author

powersj commented Feb 14, 2024

@powersj, shouldn't PRs by dependabot also be labeled chore?

Tigerbot does that for us. While I can hard-code it here, but thought I would keep the list to a minimum.

@srebhan srebhan merged commit e0ae43f into influxdata:master Feb 14, 2024
26 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v1.29.5 milestone Feb 14, 2024
powersj added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
chore ready for final review This pull request has been reviewed and/or tested by multiple users and is ready for a final review.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants