Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Patches for 0.13.1 #6681

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Patches for 0.13.1 #6681

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

jsternberg
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

jsternberg and others added 2 commits May 19, 2016 16:04
The limit optimization was put into the wrong place and caused only part
of the shard to be read when a limit was used. The optimization is
possible, but requires a bit of refactoring to the code here so the call
iterator is created per series before handed to the limit iterator.

Backport fix for #6661.
This locks showeed up in a deadlock systems running queries and
delete series across a large dataset.  Queries should not need to
lock the tsdb.Store for writes
@mention-bot
Copy link

By analyzing the blame information on this pull request, we identified @e-dard to be a potential reviewer

@jsternberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please list any patches that need to be backported for 0.13.1 here so I can cherry-pick them into this PR and we'll merge this when we have all of the changes needed for 0.13.1.

@e-dard
Copy link
Contributor

e-dard commented May 20, 2016

@jsternberg #6647 could be put into 0.13.1 since it fixes a panic.

@jsternberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Cherry picked #6647.

@pjmyburg
Copy link

Any idea on an ETA for 0.13.1?
#6661 is a bit of a problem for us, but I've been holding off on rolling back to 0.12 as we need the timezone offset functionality that was added in 0.13.

@beckettsean
Copy link
Contributor

@jsternberg at this point presumably we should close this in favor of 1.0-beta2, which is a superior release to 0.13.x?

@jsternberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think that's reasonable. I'll close this and reopen if @jwilder thinks we should still do a 0.13.1.

@jsternberg jsternberg closed this Jun 23, 2016
@sulmone
Copy link

sulmone commented Aug 3, 2016

I would appreciate a 13.1 release as well.
#6647 just killed a production InfluxDB server in our environment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants