Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Draft 02: Revise UUID Generator States section #47

Closed
kyzer-davis opened this issue Jan 20, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed

Draft 02: Revise UUID Generator States section #47

kyzer-davis opened this issue Jan 20, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
Consensus Requested

Comments

@kyzer-davis
Copy link
Collaborator

Jim:

Section 6.3, paragraph 2: "it can always say that the values were
unavailable" It says this in what way? For example, does it return an exception? Should there be normative language for this?

Kyzer

This entire section of text is from "4.2.1.1. Reading Stable Storage", "4.2.1.3. Writing Stable Storage", and "Sharing State Across Processes"
I agree, the text in this section needs some massaging.
Further, when I was porting RFC4122 into the new layout this text was somewhat out of place, but I didn't want to drop any text without first consulting the working group.
I will create a tracker to go over that section and make sure it meshes well with the rest of the doc or remove that section completely if it no longer is relevant.
@kyzer-davis kyzer-davis changed the title Verify if we need UUID Generator States section in this doc Draft 02: Verify if we need UUID Generator States section in this doc Jan 20, 2023
@kyzer-davis kyzer-davis mentioned this issue Feb 9, 2023
Closed
@kyzer-davis kyzer-davis changed the title Draft 02: Verify if we need UUID Generator States section in this doc Draft 02: Revise UUID Generator States section Feb 9, 2023
kyzer-davis added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 9, 2023
@kyzer-davis
#47
dbd874c
@kyzer-davis kyzer-davis mentioned this issue Feb 9, 2023
Merged
kyzer-davis added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 16, 2023
@kyzer-davis
Merge pull request #60 from ietf-wg-uuidrev/draft-02-merge-00
9fb3a60 
- Describe Nil/Max UUID in variant table #16
- Further Clarify that non-descript node IDs are the preferred method in distributed UUID Generation #49
- Appendix B, consistent naming #55
- Remove duplicate ABNF from IANA considerations #56
- Monotonic Error Checking missing newline #57
- More Security Considerations Randomness #26
- SHA265 UUID Generation #50
- Expand multiplexed fields within v1 and v6 bit definitions # 43
- Clean up text in UUIDs that Do Not Identify the Host #61
- Revise UUID Generator States section #47
- Expand upon why unix epoch rollover is not a problem #44
- Delete Sample Code Appendix #62
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Consensus Requested
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@kyzer-davis