You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Wouldn’t it be useful to make more explicit that the individual draft lives on as a working group draft?
Looking at the individual draft right now creates too much confusion for people trying to find out what’s going on.
Rename crawl_history to make_rev_history, which is more descriptive. Fix #2224
(thanks, Robert!) by generating graphs for the entire revision history of a doc,
both forward and backward in time. Commit ready for merge.
Merged in e14dcda from [email protected]:
Rename crawl_history to make_rev_history, which is more descriptive. Fix #2224
(thanks, Robert!) by generating graphs for the entire revision history of a doc,
both forward and backward in time.
keyword_replaced-by
owner:[email protected]
resolution_fixed
type_enhancement
| by [email protected]Compare the graphics in:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-somaraju-core-sid/
and
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-sid/
Wouldn’t it be useful to make more explicit that the individual draft lives on as a working group draft?
Looking at the individual draft right now creates too much confusion for people trying to find out what’s going on.
(Possibly unrelated observation: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-sid-00 does not show the previous versions either.)
Issue migrated from trac:2224 at 2022-03-04 05:46:27 +0000
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: