-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 466
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ability to view logs of review team's interactions with the review tool #2074
Comments
@[email protected] commented I have now verified that the data was ported over correctly from the old tool - several reviewers had "no special policy" instead of "monthly" (I had never used the round-robin selection algo of the old tool, and kept track of it offline.) I'd still like a log viewing capability. |
@[email protected] changed status from |
@[email protected] changed owner from `` to |
@[email protected] changed status from |
@[email protected] changed resolution from `` to |
@[email protected] commented Fixed in 65d8415: Fix #2074, fix #2358 - Add history for assignments, requests and unavailability. Commit ready for merge. |
@[email protected] commented Fixed in 7ec0955: Merged in 65d8415 from [email protected]: |
owner:[email protected]
resolution_fixed
type_enhancement
| by [email protected]The old review tool had a page that showed all the interactions that users had with the review tool (https://art.tools.ietf.org/tools/art/genart/index.cgi/t=3121/full_log). It would be nice if there was a similar log/audit viewing feature. What prompted this request was I noticed that several reviewers were no longer showing as once-a-month reviewers. Did they change their preferences when they logged into the new tool? Was there an issue with the data port? I'll need to ask each individually to see if they made the change or if something went wonky.
I didn't use the feature in the old tool much at all, but it was helpful for troubleshooting.
Issue migrated from trac:2074 at 2022-03-04 05:34:23 +0000
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: