Replaced force_text() with force_str(), since its deprecated in Django 3.0. #95
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've checked, and I'm sure that this code will work in Django 3.0 and Django 2.x.
force_str()is just an alias offorce_text()back to Django 2.0.This code will run in Django 1.11 (the earliest version that django-js-reverse supports), but I don't know for sure that it'll actually do the right thing. Back then,
force_str()was an alias forforce_bytes()in Python 2.x, while being an alias forforce_text()in Python 3.x. So folks still using Django 1.11 in Python 2.7 might see different behavior. However, since django-js-reverse only usesforce_str()to build a dictionary for export as JSON, I don't think this'll be an issue.