-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 73
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
propose HIPE: DIDComm explainer #98
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Daniel Hardman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Hardman <[email protected]>
I feel like this is ready for FCP. It doesn't answer all questions but is a fine foundation that can be amended through future HIPEs and PRs. |
A typical DIDComm interaction works like this: | ||
|
||
<blockquote> | ||
Imagine Alice wants to negotiate with Bob to sell something online, and |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suggest that in this example, we use a protocol that is in process. Perhaps the tic-tac-toe one. That way at the end we can point to it for details of how a protocol gets specified.
* DIDComm doesn't always involve turn-taking and request-response. | ||
* DIDComm interactions can involve more than 2 parties, and the parties are | ||
not always individuals. | ||
* DIDComm may include formats other than JSON. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure why this is needed at this point (it seems several levels of detail below this overview). Further, even if the data format is not JSON, it's delivered embedded in JSON. As such, I don't think as stated, this is correct.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Hardman <[email protected]>
This PR has been superseded by Aries RFC 0005 (https://github.com/hyperledger/aries-rfcs/tree/master/concepts/0005-didcomm) |
No description provided.