-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ControlNet Union controlnet_conditioning_scale for multiple control inputs #10666
Conversation
The docs for this PR live here. All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks for the fix!
ok, but this needs to be end-to-end for all args, now it fails with:
|
is it possible to use multiple controlnet for now? |
@john09282922 Yes. As per the title the issue is with multiple controlnet_conditioning_scale values. |
Thanks for your work, Can you explain how to use multiple controlnet through union? Is scale parameter setting up same scale? like [0.5,0.5] or [0.6, 07]? |
is it possible to use separate scales on each controlnet? |
@john09282922 After further testing we found this is a limitation of ControlNet Union - we are tracking the issue here #10656 There is some experimentation that could allow scale per control type otherwise we are planning on allowing multiple ControlNet Union models in the same manner that other ControlNet pipelines work however this would negate the benefit of ControlNet Union. A single scale value is supported which should cover most use cases, the primary use case that is not supported would be multiple |
What does this PR do?
e.g.
'controlnet_conditioning_scale': [0.5, 0.8]
Removes unneeded check that was copied from other controlnet as controlnet union supports multiple inputs with the same controlnet model.
Who can review?
Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed. Feel free to tag
members/contributors who may be interested in your PR.
@vladmandic