Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ (#236): Mailservice #288

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 10, 2025
Merged

✨ (#236): Mailservice #288

merged 7 commits into from
Feb 10, 2025

Conversation

3thr3n
Copy link
Contributor

@3thr3n 3thr3n commented Feb 5, 2025

Hat jetzt keine Templates die man benutzen kann, da ich immer noch warte auf diese. Denke aber die Basis-Implementierung kann man schon mergen. Im späteren verlauf einfach dann als PR diese dazu patchen.

@3thr3n 3thr3n requested a review from d135-1r43 February 5, 2025 21:10
@3thr3n 3thr3n self-assigned this Feb 5, 2025
This was linked to issues Feb 5, 2025
This was unlinked from issues Feb 5, 2025
@3thr3n 3thr3n force-pushed the feature/236-mailservice branch from 855daaa to da6306a Compare February 5, 2025 21:17
@3thr3n 3thr3n force-pushed the feature/236-mailservice branch from da6306a to fec1946 Compare February 5, 2025 21:21
@3thr3n
Copy link
Contributor Author

3thr3n commented Feb 5, 2025

Closes #289

@3thr3n 3thr3n linked an issue Feb 5, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Collaborator

@d135-1r43 d135-1r43 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wir brauchen noch einen SMPT Service, oder? Den würde ich als SaaS einkaufen.

@3thr3n 3thr3n requested a review from d135-1r43 February 7, 2025 18:32
@d135-1r43 d135-1r43 merged commit ed1d9df into main Feb 10, 2025
18 checks passed
@d135-1r43 d135-1r43 deleted the feature/236-mailservice branch February 10, 2025 08:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Develop the backend
2 participants