-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump criterion from 0.3.3 to 0.3.4 #72
Conversation
Bumps [criterion](https://github.com/bheisler/criterion.rs) from 0.3.3 to 0.3.4. - [Release notes](https://github.com/bheisler/criterion.rs/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/bheisler/criterion.rs/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](https://github.com/bheisler/criterion.rs/commits) Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #72 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 23.65% 23.63% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 21 21
Lines 3378 3380 +2
==========================================
Hits 799 799
- Misses 2579 2581 +2
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
These codecov reports are kind of confusing. This PR should not have any affect on the code coverage in the gdb parser ...? @stlankes This PR fails with
in one of the tests, but I don't see how this can be an error created by this PR. Is there a known issue? |
@jbreitbart There is certain (small) amount of variance in the amount of "missed lines" in coverage reports. It looks like sometimes dead code (i.e. not covered by tests, usually a trait) is not compiled into the binary, and thus not present in the coverage report (since it's source based coverage). |
I am not sure, but the current setup isn't stable. For instance, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1884470 is a bug, which I sometimes see. I think that I found a workaround, but I am not sure. |
bors retry |
bors try |
bors r+ |
Do you know if there is any github issue to follow for this? |
It looks like there isn't (at least not mentioned in the tracking issue 79121). While browsing through the issues I noticed that apparently I'll have to look into it a bit more before opening an issue. If you look into the coverage report, you'll notice that there are also a large number of white lines of code, meaning they are neither missed, nor executed lines of code. I'm interpreting this, as the lines are never generated. I'll have to investigate what causes lines to go from not generated to generated, but not executed. |
Bumps criterion from 0.3.3 to 0.3.4.
Changelog
Sourced from criterion's changelog.
Commits
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
@dependabot rebase
.Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
@dependabot rebase
will rebase this PR@dependabot recreate
will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it@dependabot merge
will merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot squash and merge
will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot cancel merge
will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging@dependabot reopen
will reopen this PR if it is closed@dependabot close
will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually@dependabot ignore this major version
will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this minor version
will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this dependency
will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)